Compact instruction-following rerankers are attractive for deployment, but conventional distillation pipelines typically train students by offline imitation of teacher outputs on a fixed set of exampl...
The paper introduces a two‑stage training framework for compact instruction‑following rerankers. Stage 1 strengthens a 4B teacher reranker with off‑policy GRPO using LLM‑judge feedback on 88K examples, while Stage 2 trains a 1B student by sampling its own rankings and receiving soft teacher‑derived rewards, blending exploration with knowledge transfer. The method achieves superior nDCG and MRR scores on MAIR‑11 and MAIR‑Full benchmarks, outperforming offline distillation baselines and larger RL‑trained rerankers.
By Vignesh Prabhakar, Jialing Pan, Anil Babu Ankisettipalli
arXiv:2610.22797v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reasoning rerankers write a rationale before ranking a candidate slate, and existing systems read item metadata to do so, even though generative reco...
By Zhenwei Tang, Jintao Liu, Di Bai, Xidong Wu, Xinwu Cheng
arXiv:2610.35218v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Generative recommendation with semantic IDs (SIDs) represents each item as a sequence of discrete tokens and autoregressively predicts the next item's...
By Fengshi Zhang, Xiyan Ding, Shuxiao Xie, Wei Zhang
hLLM (Hungarian LLM) is a decoding strategy that efficiently produces ranked lists from large language models by decoding all ordinal positions in a single forward pass. It extracts an item‑position score matrix from the model’s hidden states, then applies the Hungarian algorithm to obtain a valid permutation, avoiding the sequential token generation of traditional autoregressive decoding. Experiments show that LoRA‑based fine‑tuning with teacher ranking distillation achieves 28 ms end‑to‑end inference, a 64× speed‑up while preserving ranking quality comparable to the teacher model.
By Emil Laftchiev, Prachi Agrawal, Moe Kayali, Bixing Yan, Qi Xu, Zijie Lei, Chen Qiu, Zhi Hua, Ke Li, Luke Simon
The paper introduces a new scorer for generative answer engines that ranks candidate pages by the likelihood of being cited. It evaluates pretrained rerankers, a hosted typed decision model (Jev), eight open decision models, and a distilled 4B student on GEO‑Bench queries answered by ten engines. The distilled student, fine‑tuned with low‑rank adapters, achieves comparable performance to larger models and the authors release the model, benchmark, predictions, and code.
By Elisha Bajemon, Andre-Louis Rochet