arXiv AI

LAWFUL: Law-Aligned Witness for Faithful Use of Latents

arXiv:2607. 28672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a neural network predicts a physical system accurately, has it learned the governing law as formal, structured knowledge, and if so, does the network's internal computation actually use that representation throughout the law's domain of validity?

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

Legal LLM Hallucination Should Be Evaluated as Failure of Legal Warrant

The paper argues that hallucinations by legal language models should be judged as failures of legal warrant rather than mere factual or citation errors. It defines claim-authority warrant as a context-sensitive relationship between a legal claim and applicable, current authority, and proposes that evaluating warrant can uncover failures missed by traditional accuracy or citation metrics. The authors outline a pilot study, benchmark specifications, and a research agenda to assess whether legal AI systems’ claims are properly licensed by law.

By Maksym Taranukhin, Vered Shwartz
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

VeriPhy: Agentic Physical Reasoning for World Model Evaluation and Refinement

VeriPhy is an auditable physical‑verification system that transforms a text prompt into typed physical obligations and a statically validated execution plan before any video frames are generated. During execution, it gates calls to frozen low‑level experts (segmentation, tracking, counting, depth, OCR, audio‑event detection, etc.) and records provenance‑carrying evidence for each action. The system maps these records to a three‑valued state—supported, contradicted, or unknown—providing traceable verdicts that can be used to refine generation models.

By Wenzhuo Xu, Yuchen Zhu, Chongjian Ge, Xuan Shen, Jing Shi, Jason Kuen, Yongxin Chen, Molei Tao, Christopher McComb, Noelia Grande Guti\'errez, Jiuxiang Gu
arXiv AI
Jun 4

Parthenon Law: A Self-Evolving Legal-Agent Framework

arXiv:2606. 04602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agents grow more capable, legal-domain LLM agents promise to turn document-heavy matters into reviewable work products -- yet reliable deployment faces three obstacles: no large-scale evidence on how today's strongest model-and-harness combinations behave on end-to-end legal matters; no agent architecture adapted to the legal vertical, only general-purpose harnesses; and, in a setting that keeps shifting with new facts, authorities, and deadlines, no mechanism for systems to learn from their own outcomes.

By Hejia Geng, Leo Liu
arXiv Computation and Language
Nov 4

A Bounded Evaluation Protocol for Representational Systematicity

The paper introduces Bounded-RS, a protocol for testing whether neural networks are representationally systematic. It evaluates explanations by checking if the claimed representation is recoverable and causally used, then classifies the explanation into one of four states: Unsupported, Present-only, Causal-use, or Undetermined. Applied to a semantic‑parsing benchmark, the protocol finds that T5’s role‑filler Binding explanation is Causal‑use while its Geometry explanation is Unsupported, and it demonstrates high reliability across different configurations.

By Boyu Cao, Wenshuo Wang
arXiv AI
6d ago

Certified Circuits: Stability Guarantees for Mechanistic Circuits

Certified Circuits introduces a framework that wraps any black‑box circuit discovery algorithm with randomized data subsampling to provide provable stability guarantees. By certifying that inclusion decisions over circuit components are invariant to bounded edit‑distance perturbations of the concept dataset, unstable components are abstained from, producing more compact and accurate mechanistic explanations. Across ResNet, ViT, and GPT‑2 on vision and language tasks, Certified Circuits achieves up to 56% higher accuracy and up to 80% fewer components, maintaining reliability where baseline methods degrade.

By Alaa Anani, Tobias Lorenz, Bernt Schiele, Mario Fritz, Jonas Fischer