arXiv AI
Jun 9
Instrumented data for causal scientific machine learning
arXiv:2606. 07865v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific machine learning is limited less by model size than by the data it is trained on.
LAWFUL: Law-Aligned Witness for Faithful Use of Latents
arXiv:2607. 28672v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: When a neural network predicts a physical system accurately, has it learned the governing law as formal, structured knowledge, and if so, does the network's internal computation actually use that representation throughout the law's domain of validity?
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jul 28
WIRE: Profiling Witnessed Within-Policy Instruction Collisions in LLM Agents
arXiv:2605. 27784v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agents are governed by long-lived prompt policies, where individually reasonable stand- ing rules can jointly govern the same pre- generation state.
arXiv AI
Aug 13
Agent Safety Should Be a Runtime Contract
arXiv:2608. 11274v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The dominant paradigm treats AI safety as a property to be instilled during model training via RLHF, DPO, or Constitutional AI.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7
SEAM: Global consistency beyond local accuracy in scientific machine learning
arXiv:2608. 05702v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific machine learning commonly validates models at the level of a subdomain, a benchmark split, or an explanation for one prediction.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
Parthenon Law: A Self-Evolving Legal-Agent Framework
arXiv:2606. 04602v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As agents grow more capable, legal-domain LLM agents promise to turn document-heavy matters into reviewable work products -- yet reliable deployment faces three obstacles: no large-scale evidence on how today's strongest model-and-harness combinations behave on end-to-end legal matters; no agent architecture adapted to the legal vertical, only general-purpose harnesses; and, in a setting that keeps shifting with new facts, authorities, and deadlines, no mechanism for systems to learn from their own outcomes.
arXiv AI
Jul 28
Confidently Wrong: Exception Chain Collapse in Frontier LLM Rule Evaluation
arXiv:2607. 23386v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We document a failure class in frontier large language models -- exception chain collapse -- observed in eligibility evaluation under nested conditional rules of the form "A is required UNLESS B applies, UNLESS C overrides B".
arXiv AI
Aug 18
When Do LLMs Apply the Wrong Law? Diagnosing LLM Failures in Temporal Legal Reasoning
arXiv:2608. 14610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Legal reasoning tasks such as legal judgment prediction (LJP) require identifying the temporally correct version of the law governing a case -- a capability we term temporal applicable-law determination.
arXiv AI
Aug 18
What Do Compliance Detectors Read? An Audit of Activation Probes and Guard Models
arXiv:2608. 16852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Regulatory compliance monitoring in deployed language models is increasingly implemented as a legal and audit control, checking model outputs against written rules spanning data protection, healthcare, financial regulation, and platform policy.
arXiv AI
Jun 15
Actionable Interpretability Must Be Defined in Terms of Symmetries
arXiv:2601. 12913v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: This paper argues that interpretability research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is fundamentally ill-posed as existing definitions of interpretability fail to describe how interpretability can be formally tested or designed for.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3
Parthenon Law: A Self-Evolving Legal-Agent Framework
As agents grow more capable, legal-domain LLM agents promise to turn document-heavy matters into reviewable work products -- yet reliable deployment faces three obstacles: no large-scale evidence on how today's strongest model-and-harness combinations behave on end-to-end legal matters; no agent architecture adapted to the legal vertical, only general-purpose harnesses; and, in a setting that keeps shifting with new facts, authorities, and deadlines, no mechanism for systems to learn from their own outcomes. We address each.
arXiv AI
Jul 15
Evidence-Grounded Verified Agentic Reasoning: A Path Toward Eliminating LLM Hallucination in Empirical Inference via Tool-Attested Kernel Proofs
arXiv:2607. 12650v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool access alone does not make LLM empirical reasoning governable: accepted outputs need not descend from attested evidence, and accepted deductions need not hold up under formal scrutiny.
arXiv AI
Aug 17
Implementing Computational Law in Wolfram Language for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2608. 13958v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: How do we govern AI systems whose reasoning we cannot fully inspect?