The paper introduces EyeControl, an intent-driven image retouching agent that enhances visual focus by guiding attention to a target region with minimal user input. It combines a multi‑modal large language model to interpret user intent and a diffusion‑based retouching executor that aligns its attention map with a pseudo‑intent map, while an operation‑consistency constraint ensures natural global and local adjustments. The authors also present ControlArt‑Bench, a dataset for evaluating visual focus enhancement, and demonstrate that EyeControl achieves perceptually appealing results with stronger intent alignment.
arXiv:2606. 02735v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generalization remains a central bottleneck for vision-language-action (VLA) models: under distractors, appearance shifts, and semantically similar tasks, the policy must often infer local execution details from coarse instructions while also deciding which parts of the image matter for control.
arXiv:2605. 20950v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) face a bottleneck of prohibitive computational costs arising from massive visual token sequences during inference.
arXiv:2507. 15833v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Human vision is a highly active process driven by gaze, which directs attention to task-relevant regions through foveation, dramatically reducing visual processing.
arXiv:2509. 06461v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across diverse visual tasks, yet their performance degrades in complex visual environments.
arXiv:2606. 08016v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current image editing software often hinges on fixed filters or expert tuning, leaving a gap between amateur users' intent and outcomes.
arXiv:2607.18227v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In line with the prevailing direction of vision research, we explore the integration of both generation and editing capabilities for video and imag...
arXiv:2606. 14703v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: How a vision-language model internally solves the task of describing an image is far from obvious.
arXiv:2608. 07565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Conversational assistants increasingly recommend follow-up edits to help users continue a task.
arXiv:2511. 00810v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graphical user interface (GUI) grounding is a key capability for computer-use agents, mapping natural-language instructions to actionable regions on the screen.
arXiv:2609.13318v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: 3D point-cloud observations are inherently ambiguous in complex, cluttered manipulation scenes, where target objects may be partially occluded or tig...
arXiv:2607. 05465v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Complex image creation and editing often require more than a single generation or editing model.
The paper investigates how visuomotor imitation policies fail when visually similar distractors are introduced, framing the issue as conditional visual grounding where the target changes with manipulation phase and task state. Using Action Chunking with Transformers (ACT), the authors systematically vary color and shape similarity of distractors, pinpointing failures to picking and placement stages. They then test distractor augmentation, phase‑dependent attention regularization, and appearance‑based visual prompting, which together significantly improve robustness in simulation and on a physical UR3e robot, and demonstrate similar improvements on a pretrained vision‑language‑action policy for instrument handling.