ExpertIVS is a framework that uses 14 sociological expert agents to interpret World Values Survey responses, reconstructing individual value systems in a coherent, internally consistent manner rather than simply concatenating survey answers. It introduces a multi‑agent debate mechanism to assess LLM alignment with these value profiles during dynamic interactions. Experiments on 480 individuals from 12 countries show a 90.78% value restoration fidelity and a 5.3% improvement in value generalization over baseline methods, while also demonstrating strong personality discriminability and behavioral consistency.
By Zhen Wang, Yuqi Ren, Yuehan Cui, Hongxiang Wang, Jianxiang Peng, Zhaoxia Zhang, Bingkun Zhu, Tongxuan Zhang, Dezhi Tong, Deyi Xiong
arXiv:2605. 30036v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate a remarkable capacity to adopt different personas and roles; however, it remains unclear whether they can manifest behavior that adheres to a coherent, human-like value structure.
By Asaf Yehudai, Naama Rozen, Ariel Gera
arXiv:2601. 22396v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing utility of Large Language Models (LLMs) for simulating human behavior, the extent to which these synthetic personas accurately reflect world and moral value systems across different cultural conditionings remains uncertain.
By Candida M. Greco, Lucio La Cava, Andrea Tagarelli
arXiv:2607. 24782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM behavior may be conditioned by human identity in several ways: they may be asked to adapt to users, role-play populations, or forecast how people would answer value-laden questions.
By James Wedgwood, Pratiksha Thaker, Neil Kale, Virginia Smith
arXiv:2606. 18263v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human populations via persona prompting, often under the assumptions that richer persona descriptions improve behavioral fidelity, similarly sized attribute combinations are equally simulatable, and persona definitions generalize across tasks.
By Aanisha Bhattacharyya, Yaman Kumar Singla, Rajiv Ratn Shah, Changyou Chen, Jitendra Ajmera
arXiv:2610.08513v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: LLMs are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in social environments, making it critical to study their ability to faithfully simulate human in...
By Dennis Fucci, Andrea Bacciu, Dong Liu, Weronika {\L}ajewska, Saab Mansour
arXiv:2607. 26348v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as synthetic users, stand-ins for human respondents whose simulated answers feed product, policy, and market decisions.
By Zihan Chen, Di Zhu, Lei Nico Zheng
PERSONAWEAVER is a new approach to procedural character generation that separates world building from behavioral specification, using manually curated banks of moral positions and conversational reactions to diversify character behavior. By applying this method across ten realistic and fantastical settings and three large language models, the system produces broader moral and interactional response distributions, varied interpersonal language, response length, sentiment, and less archetypal world attribute combinations compared to prior work.
By Maan Qraitem, Kate Saenko, Bryan A. Plummer
arXiv:2507.19364v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into social simulation has generated considerable enthusiasm, but also raises substantial methodolo...
By Patrick Taillandier, Jean Daniel Zucker, Arnaud Grignard, Benoit Gaudou, Nghi Quang Huynh, Haojia Kong, Alexis Drogoul
arXiv:2607. 05405v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To interact with users fairly and without stereotyping, AI models must display cultural competency, i.
By Vasudha Varadarajan, Akhila Yerukola, Mona T. Diab, Maarten Sap
The study examines how large language models (LLMs) respond to simultaneous cultural identity cues, comparing explicit country names with implicit language cues. Using World Values Survey probing and open‑ended sociopolitical generation, it finds that language cues shift responses more than explicit cues but not toward the named country’s distribution, while explicit cues produce more differentiated value changes. Across 1.6 million responses, naming a country narrows the gap to the model’s own country‑specific answers by 30–44%.
By Siddhesh Pawar, Arnav Arora, Dustin Wright, Dirk Hovy, Isabelle Augenstein
arXiv:2606. 05890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLMs are increasingly deployed as Artificial Moral Advisors (AMA) in a variety of contexts: what kind of conversational patterns should they display?
By Salvatore Greco, Hainiu Xu, Jacopo Domenicucci, Yulan He, Sylvie Delacroix