arXiv:2606. 12281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Decentralized Training and Decentralized Execution (DTDE) for cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), action-advising-based knowledge sharing promotes interpretable and scalable cooperation among agents.
By Jinyuan Zu, Xiaowei Lv, Yongcai Wang, Deying Li, Yunjun Han, Wenping Chen, Fengyi Zhang, Naiqi Wu
arXiv:2605. 18077v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Communication is a key component in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) for mitigating partial observability, yet prior approaches often rely on inefficient information exchange or fail to transmit sufficient state information.
By Sangjun Bae, Yisak Park, Sanghyeon Lee, Seungyul Han
arXiv:2606. 30966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Formal specification is a powerful tool to guide the learning process and provides significant advantages over reward shaping: (1) mathematical rigor; (2) expressiveness to specify objectives and constraints, and (3) the ability to define tactics to achieve objectives.
By Arshia Rafieioskouei, Tzu-Han Hsu, Matthew Lucas, Borzoo Bonakdarpour
arXiv:2511. 02304v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study learning multi-task, multi-agent policies for cooperative, temporal objectives, under centralized training, decentralized execution.
By Beyazit Yalcinkaya, Marcell Vazquez-Chanlatte, Ameesh Shah, Hanna Krasowski, Sanjit A. Seshia
arXiv:2507. 23604v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods allow for learning scalable multi-agent policies, but suffer from partial observability and induced non-stationarity.
By Tommaso Marzi, Cesare Alippi, Andrea Cini
arXiv:2606. 30072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cooperative tasks in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) require agents to collectively maximize a shared return.
By Daiki E. Matsunaga, Junho Na, Tri Wahyu Guntara, Scott Sanner, Pascal Poupart, Jongmin Lee, Kee-Eung Kim
arXiv:2607. 19809v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), inter-agent communication is effective for improving performance under partial observability.
By Taisuke Takayama, Naoto Yoshida, Tadahiro Taniguchi
arXiv:2607. 16745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent planning becomes substantially harder when agents must improve specialized decision-making skills while keeping their internal implementations private.
By Nguyen Viet Tuan Kiet, Bui Dinh Pham, Duong Quoc Chinh, Dao Van Tung, Tran Cong Dao, Huynh Thi Thanh Binh
arXiv:2609.15361v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Effective communication is a cornerstone of distributed intelligence in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), yet ensuring that generated messag...
By Rafael Pina, Varuna De Silva, Corentin Artaud
G2MAF is a test‑time refinement framework for offline multi‑agent reinforcement learning that applies a single globally normalized, projected critic gradient to adjust all agents’ actions while keeping them close to a frozen policy proposal. The method improves performance on 24 Multi‑Party Environment (MPE) and StarCraft Multi‑Agent Challenge (SMAC) benchmarks, achieving mean relative gains of 9.2% on MPE and 8.9% on SMAC, with only a 6% increase in inference latency.
By Guowei Zou, Haitao Wang, Guoxin Wang, Zhiquan Chen, Beiwen Zhang, Guojie Wang, Hejun Wu
arXiv:2605. 12655v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) in real-world use cases may need to adapt to external natural language instructions that interrupt ongoing behavior and conflict with long-horizon objectives.
By Wo Wei Lin, Ethan Rathbun, Enrico Marchesini, Xiang Zhi Tan
arXiv:2607. 18359v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Critical infrastructures are increasingly distributed, interdependent, and exposed to evolving disruptions, making resilience a central requirement for their operation and control.
By Minghui Ding, Evangelos Pournaras