arXiv:2608. 11658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many reinforcement learning systems, from fleet management to traffic signal control, must serve an objective that changes dynamically after deployment, and retraining a policy for each new objective is prohibitively expensive.
By Zijian Zhao, Sen Li
arXiv:2608. 08604v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is a powerful framework for solving complex collaborative tasks, but it relies heavily on well-defined global reward functions.
By Ni Mu, Yao Luan, Yiqin Yang, Qing-Shan Jia
arXiv:2607. 19117v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parameterized action reinforcement learning has shown strong performance in environments requiring both discrete action selection and continuous parameterization.
By Ubayd Ali Bapoo, Clement N Nyirenda
arXiv:2508. 13661v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) is the dominant paradigm in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), enabling agents to act independently at test time while leveraging additional information during training.
By Maciej Wojtala, Bogusz Stefa\'nczyk, Dominik Bogucki, {\L}ukasz Lepak, Pawe{\l} Wawrzy\'nski
Emergency management assistance programs, such as relief distribution, are essential for delivering necessary supplies to affected communities. However, these programs operate in a decentralized netwo...
arXiv:2604. 13472v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is widely used to address large joint observation and action spaces by decomposing a centralized control problem into multiple interacting agents.
By Zijian Zhao, Jing Gao, Sen Li
CoRe-MARL is a cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning framework designed for decentralized relief distribution networks. It models each local center as an agent in a Dec-POMDP, using a recurrent network to learn redistribution policies that reduce service gaps and improve the worst-served region. Experiments show that recurrent MAPPO outperforms independent PPO and heuristic baselines, maintaining competitive network-wide service while adapting to evolving supply and demand dynamics.
By Naimur Rahman Chowdhury, Shatabdi Sen Prapti, Md. Salehin Seyam, Limon Bin Hossain
The paper introduces Hierarchical Reinforcement and Collective Learning (HRCL), a framework that combines multi‑agent reinforcement learning (MARL) with decentralized coordination. HRCL uses MARL at a high level to generate strategic guidance that limits the decision space for low‑level agents, enabling efficient short‑term coordination while considering long‑term effects. Experiments on synthetic, energy‑management, and drone‑swarm scenarios demonstrate faster convergence and significant reductions in system‑wide and individual costs compared to standalone MARL.
By Chuhao Qin, Evangelos Pournaras
G2MAF is a test‑time refinement framework for offline multi‑agent reinforcement learning that applies a single globally normalized, projected critic gradient to adjust all agents’ actions while keeping them close to a frozen policy proposal. The method improves performance on 24 Multi‑Party Environment (MPE) and StarCraft Multi‑Agent Challenge (SMAC) benchmarks, achieving mean relative gains of 9.2% on MPE and 8.9% on SMAC, with only a 6% increase in inference latency.
By Guowei Zou, Haitao Wang, Guoxin Wang, Zhiquan Chen, Beiwen Zhang, Guojie Wang, Hejun Wu
arXiv:2511. 02304v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We study learning multi-task, multi-agent policies for cooperative, temporal objectives, under centralized training, decentralized execution.
By Beyazit Yalcinkaya, Marcell Vazquez-Chanlatte, Ameesh Shah, Hanna Krasowski, Sanjit A. Seshia
arXiv:2507. 23604v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods allow for learning scalable multi-agent policies, but suffer from partial observability and induced non-stationarity.
By Tommaso Marzi, Cesare Alippi, Andrea Cini
arXiv:2606. 11284v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world multi-agent systems, from traffic coordination to resource allocation, are often modeled as general-sum games where individual incentives conflict with collective welfare.
By Wongyu Lee, Francesco Lelli, Omran Ayoub, Massimo Tornatore