arXiv:2606. 03143v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern LLM agents increasingly rely on skill libraries to handle complex tasks, making skill evolution a primary driver of self-improvement.
By Jingbo Yang, Guanyu Yao, Yang Zhang, Ramana Rao Kompella, Gaowen Liu, Shiyu Chang
arXiv:2508. 13661v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Centralized Training with Decentralized Execution (CTDE) is the dominant paradigm in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), enabling agents to act independently at test time while leveraging additional information during training.
By Maciej Wojtala, Bogusz Stefa\'nczyk, Dominik Bogucki, {\L}ukasz Lepak, Pawe{\l} Wawrzy\'nski
arXiv:2606. 12281v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In Decentralized Training and Decentralized Execution (DTDE) for cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), action-advising-based knowledge sharing promotes interpretable and scalable cooperation among agents.
By Jinyuan Zu, Xiaowei Lv, Yongcai Wang, Deying Li, Yunjun Han, Wenping Chen, Fengyi Zhang, Naiqi Wu
arXiv:2602. 12430v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The transition from monolithic language models to modular, skill-equipped agents marks a defining shift in how large language models (LLMs) are deployed in practice.
By Renjun Xu, Yang Yan
arXiv:2607. 18719v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study proposes a learning method for multi-agent systems that allows agents to be controlled through human manager instructions after learning and enables uninstructed agents to implicitly complement the overall work based on the actions of other agents.
By Yamato Takahagi, Gentoku Nakasone, Yoshinari Motokawa, Toshiharu Sugawara
arXiv:2603. 17673v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM agents are becoming increasingly important in the security domain, but leading systems are often closed-source, cloud-based, hard to reproduce or use with sensitive code.
By Philipp Normann, Andreas Happe, J\"urgen Cito, Daniel Arp
arXiv:2605. 09823v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Personal AI assistants are beginning to act as delegates with access to calendars, inboxes, and user preferences.
By Chelsea Zou, Yiheng Yao, Selena She, Noah Goodman, Robert D. Hawkins
Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair agents inside a verifier-checked refinement loop, but the orchestrator at the centre is itself a prompted frontier LLM, paying a frontier-LLM API call at every refinement step.
arXiv:2608. 04934v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training LLM agents commonly relies on supervised fine-tuning from expert trajectories or online reinforcement learning over human-specified tasks with handcrafted verifiers.
By Xuanyu Lei, Yiqi Zhu, Chenliang Li, Kaiming Liu, Peng Li, Ming Yan, Jieping Ye, Ya-Qin Zhang, Yang Liu
arXiv:2608. 11658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many reinforcement learning systems, from fleet management to traffic signal control, must serve an objective that changes dynamically after deployment, and retraining a policy for each new objective is prohibitively expensive.
By Zijian Zhao, Sen Li
arXiv:2607. 11250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another.
By Hyeong Kyu Choi, Jiatong Li, Wendi Li, Xin Eric Wang, Sharon Li
arXiv:2508. 14751v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study goal-conditioned reinforcement learning in partially observable environments with sparse rewards and large, structured goal spaces.
By Thomas Carta, Cl\'ement Romac, Loris Gaven, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Olivier Sigaud, Sylvain Lamprier