arXiv Computation and Language

Towards the Roof of the World: NLP Progress in Tibetan Languages

The paper presents the first systematic bibliometric survey of Tibetan NLP, covering 140 publications from 2004 to 2026. It shows rapid growth—84% of the work appears since 2018—and a bottom‑up expansion across the NLP pipeline, from corpora and word segmentation to large language models. The study highlights that most research originates in China, identifies gaps in dialect coverage, responsible NLP, and resource release, and calls for open science and community participation to support Tibetan and other low‑resource languages.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

A Systematic Review of NLP for Ghanaian Languages: Datasets, Models, and a Research Roadmap

arXiv:2405.06818v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) for Ghana's 73 living indigenous languages remains deeply fragmented, under-resourced, and heavily skewed toward...

By Sheriff Issaka, Erick Rosas Gonzalez, Colene Agbo, Evans Kofi Agyei, Shruti Tyagi, John Emeka Eze, Enock Appiah Tieku, Junlin Fang, Thanh Do Nguyen, Juliet Arthur, Zhaoyi Zhang, Mihir Heda, Keyi Wang, Yinka Ajibola, Rebecca Akpanglo-Nartey, Frank Lawrence Nii Adoquaye Acquaye, Dennis Owusu, Jerry John Kponyo, Stephen Moore, Isaac Wiafe, Sean Du
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

A Factorial Study of Synthetic Data Generation for Low-Resource Machine Translation using Grammar Books

The paper presents a pipeline that leverages large language models to extract grammatical rules, example sentences, and lexicons from descriptive grammar books, producing synthetic parallel corpora for fine‑tuning machine translation models. Evaluated on three low‑resource languages—Kalamang, Tuatschin, and Mandan—the synthetic data improves translation quality over seed‑data baselines in 75% of configurations for Kalamang and 59% for Tuatschin, achieving up to +8.8 ChrF++ gains. A factorial study across 96 configurations identifies which combinations of target part‑of‑speech, retrieval granularity, and sample volume drive performance gains and where they fail, demonstrating that static linguistic documentation can be repurposed for practical translation tools for severely under‑resourced languages.

By Varun Ghat Ravikumar, Sina Ahmadi, Lena J\"ager, Rico Sennrich
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

CNeo-Bench: Diagnosing Large Language Models on Chinese Neologisms

CNeo-Bench is a new benchmark comprising 4,759 Chinese neologisms, each with reference definitions and categorized by linguistic mechanisms such as phonetic substitution and visual character decomposition. The benchmark includes a two-tier evaluation framework that tests whether models can describe a neologism and whether they can manipulate its underlying mechanism. Evaluation of 18 large language models shows that most perform poorly on definition generation (below 40%) and exhibit a recognition‑manipulation gap, often paraphrasing rather than restoring the original form; few‑shot prompting helps but does not fully resolve the errors.

By Kaiyan Zhao, Zhongtao Miao, Zheyong Xie, Shaosheng Cao, Yoshimasa Tsuruoka
arXiv AI
Sep 1

AtlasNLP: A Country-Aware Atlas of Dataset Representation in NLP

arXiv:2608.30107v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding which countries are represented in NLP datasets is essential for identifying gaps, targeting data collection, measuring progress, and i...

By Joan Nwatu, Tsedeniya Solomon Amare, Longju Bai, Bontu Fufa Balcha, Zayd Bashir, Angana Borah, Zara Burzo, Yubin Choi, Naihao Deng, Samika Gupta, Michel Faloughi, Claude Kwizera, Ziqiao Ma, Cynthia Yacel Fuertes Panizo, Ellie Seehorn, Hui Shen, Jiayi Tang, Zesen Zhao, Boyuan Zheng, Rada Mihalcea
arXiv AI
Sep 18

KoNeoBench: A Curated Evaluation Dataset for LLM Understanding of Korean Neologisms

KoNeoBench is a curated dataset designed to evaluate large language models’ understanding of Korean neologisms. It contains 1,785 recently attested Korean words from online news since 2020, each accompanied by usage examples, word‑formation analyses, and dictionary‑style definitions. The authors define four evaluation tasks, report results from recent models and a human baseline, and find that current LLMs struggle with recovering source components, distinguishing semantic categories, and generating accurate definitions.

By Soha Lee, Soojin Lee, Heesung Yang, Hyunju Song, Hyunji Lee, Jinsan An, Jeongwan Shin, Jin Hyun Park, Jun Lee, Hyeyoung Park, Kilim Nam