A Systematic Review of NLP for Ghanaian Languages: Datasets, Models, and a Research Roadmap
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
arXiv:2601.09716v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Natural Language Processing (NLP) is rapidly transforming research methodologies across disciplines, yet African languages remain largely underrepr...
arXiv:2610.28173v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) depend fundamentally on the diversity, depth, and factual rigor of their pre-training corpora. However, contemporary fou...
arXiv:2606. 12708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite their linguistic diversity and global significance, African languages remain underrepresented in research and resources to support NLP.
The paper surveys NLP research on Nigeria’s three major low‑resource languages—Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo—covering over 500 languages spoken by 175 million people. It reviews 293 studies, finding that only 27.6% produced new linguistic resources, indicating a heavy reliance on repurposing existing data. The authors highlight under‑explored challenges such as morphological analysis and diacritic representation, and call for collaborative resource enrichment and community support to advance NaijaNLP and low‑resource NLP more broadly.
The paper audits 51 recent multilingual evaluation benchmarks covering 242 datasets and 219 languages, focusing on coverage, representativeness, and rigor. It finds that while coverage is broad, many languages appear in only one benchmark and entire regions are underrepresented; low‑resource languages face a task equity gap. Representativeness is compromised by heavy reliance on English translations, and rigor is weakened by benchmark contamination and parallel‑corpus overlap. The authors propose concrete recommendations for building evaluation frameworks that are natively constructed, culturally grounded, contamination‑aware, and community‑aligned.
The paper presents the first systematic bibliometric survey of Tibetan NLP, covering 140 publications from 2004 to 2026. It shows rapid growth—84% of the work appears since 2018—and a bottom‑up expansion across the NLP pipeline, from corpora and word segmentation to large language models. The study highlights that most research originates in China, identifies gaps in dialect coverage, responsible NLP, and resource release, and calls for open science and community participation to support Tibetan and other low‑resource languages.