arXiv:2605. 08832v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural surrogate models for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are typically trained as forward operators that map explicit problem specifications, such as geometry and boundary conditions, to solution fields.
By Jonas Weidner, Yeray Martin-Ruisanchez, Daniel Rueckert, Benedikt Wiestler, Julian Suk
arXiv:2509. 15900v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This work aims to predict blood flow with non-Newtonian viscosity in stenosed arteries using convolutional neural network (CNN) surrogate models.
By Simon Klaes, Axel Klawonn, Natalie Kubicki, Martin Lanser, Kengo Nakajima, Takashi Shimokawabe, Janine Weber
arXiv:2605. 08843v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural surrogate models for physical simulations are trained on discretized samples of continuous domains, where the induced empirical measure leads to uneven supervision, biasing optimization and causing spatial inconsistencies in physical fidelity.
By Yuan Mei, Xingyu Song, Xiaowen Song, Naoya Takeishi
arXiv:2606. 09949v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data-driven PDE surrogates are trained with data produced by numerical PDE solvers.
By Pierre Cesar (DATAMOVE), Sofya Dymchenko (DATAMOVE), Abhishek Purandare (DATAMOVE), Bruno Raffin (DATAMOVE)
arXiv:2608. 00852v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Understanding and controlling complex dynamical systems often requires executing thousands of numerical simulations across vast parametric landscapes, which is time-consuming.
By Ajitesh Srivastava
arXiv:2607. 07863v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In physically dominated machining processes, experimental datasets are small, expensive, and material-specific; in this regime, data curation, evaluation design, and the form of physics integration can matter as much as the learning algorithm.
By Sarah Grewe, J\"org Frochte
arXiv:2603. 22050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Supervised machine learning describes the practice of fitting a parameterized model to labeled input-output data.
By Atticus Rex, Elizabeth Qian, David Peterson
arXiv:2606. 06164v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data.
By Nanxi Chen, Chuanjie Cui, Airong Chen, Sifan Wang, Rujin Ma
arXiv:2505. 11766v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural Operators (NOs) are powerful architectures for learning mappings between function spaces.
By Haoze Song, Zhihao Li, Xiaobo Zhang, Zecheng Gan, Zhilu Lai, Wei Wang
arXiv:2512. 13765v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The forward problem in electrocardiology, computing body surface potentials from cardiac electrical activity, is traditionally solved using physics-based models such as the bidomain or monodomain equations.
By Shaheim Ogbomo-Harmitt, Cesare Magnetti, Chiara Spota, Jakub Grzelak, Oleg Aslanidi
arXiv:2604. 01349v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reservoir simulation workflows face a fundamental data asymmetry: input parameter fields (geostatistical permeability realizations, porosity distributions) are free to generate in arbitrary quantities, yet existing neural operator surrogates require large corpora of expensive labeled simulation trajectories and cannot exploit this unlabeled structure.
By Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh
Physics-informed neural operators (PINOs) aim to learn solution operators for partial differential equations by using the governing physics as supervision, rather than relying solely on paired input-output simulation data. By incorporating physical constraints into the training objective, PINOs combine the cross-instance generalization of neural operators with the data efficiency of physics-informed learning.