arXiv:2603. 22050v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Supervised machine learning describes the practice of fitting a parameterized model to labeled input-output data.
By Atticus Rex, Elizabeth Qian, David Peterson
PhysicsBench is a unified benchmark and leaderboard that evaluates both generative and predictive AI models for engineering design and simulation under a single standardized procedure. It covers seven generation and prediction tasks across 1D, 2D, and 3D domains, ranking 66 models on nine industrial‑scale CAD/CFD/FEA datasets and public references, expanded into 28 configurations. The evaluation uses realistic, limited data scales and a common metric suite that captures geometric fidelity, physical‑field accuracy, and engineering‑specific validity, with rankings derived via a PageRank‑based dominance graph and a separate efficiency view.
By Sang Won Lee, Hyogu Jeong, Namwoo Kang
arXiv:2606. 11605v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predicting process-property relationships in manufacturing is often challenged by high experimental costs and the limited interpretability of complex 'black-box' models.
By Ge Song, Kiarash Naghavi Khanghah, Anandkumar Patel, Rajiv Malhotra, Hongyi Xu
arXiv:2503.19081v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) aim to learn generalizable representations of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PD...
By Serge Kotchourko, Amin Totounferoush, Michael W. Mahoney, Steffen Staab
arXiv:2607. 07379v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In agentic scientific machine learning (SciML), large language model (LLM) agents can discover surrogate models and select one by an automated score, typically an error metric.
By Diab W. Abueidda, Bilal Ahmed, Panos Pantidis, Mostafa E. Mobasher
arXiv:2606. 08238v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constitutive modeling of the relationship between process-imposed material states and fundamental material properties is critical to control of material microstructure in manufacturing processes.
By Soumik Dutta, Kiarash Naghavi Khanghah, Sania Shree, Logan McNeil, Thomas Feldhausen, Hongyi Xu, Rajiv Malhotra
arXiv:2605. 08843v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural surrogate models for physical simulations are trained on discretized samples of continuous domains, where the induced empirical measure leads to uneven supervision, biasing optimization and causing spatial inconsistencies in physical fidelity.
By Yuan Mei, Xingyu Song, Xiaowen Song, Naoya Takeishi
arXiv:2509. 13805v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Foundation models have revolutionized natural language processing through a ``train once, deploy anywhere'' paradigm, where a single pre-trained model adapts to countless downstream tasks without retraining.
By Florian Wiesner, Zo\"e J. Gray, Matthias Wessling, Stephen Baek
arXiv:2607. 23377v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The largest machine learning models in particle physics are also the most expensive to train, yet the return on scaling a given architecture cannot be estimated before that compute is spent.
By Jan-Lucas Uslu, Benjamin Nachman, Christopher Re
arXiv:2606. 14870v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) trained on large datasets and fine-tuned on downstream tasks have emerged as a powerful paradigm in AI for science.
By Ibrahim Elsharkawy, Joschka Birk, Vinicius Mikuni, Wahid Bhimji, Gregor Kasieczka, Benjamin Nachman
arXiv:2608. 13793v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become an indispensable part of modern engineering design workflows.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Christopher P. Muller, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2609.08620v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: We address the challenge of scalable uncertainty quantification in large-scale scientific applications, where complex state-of-the-art machine learni...
By Yousra El-Bachir, Frederik Van der Veken, Davide di Croce, Carlo Emilio Montanari, Massimo Giovannozzi, Ekaterina Krymova, Tatiana Pieloni