arXiv:2609.36400v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Deep learning classifiers for dermoscopic skin lesions often reach high in-distribution accuracy while quietly relying on spurious background cues su...
By Youssef Attia, Debasmita Mukherjee
arXiv:2609.07180v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for nearly 80% of skin cancer di- agnoses. Its optimal clinical managem...
By Alexandros Papadopoulos, Chrysa Episkopou, Ioannis Sarafis, Aimilios Lallas, Anastasios Delopoulos
The paper evaluates how well generalist and dermatology-specific machine learning models perform on diverse skin lesion datasets, including dermoscopic images and smartphone photographs. It benchmarks a range of architectures—general-purpose vision-language models, foundation models, and task-specific dermatology classifiers—under conditions of distribution shift, modality change, and demographic variability. The study quantifies the performance gap between current state‑of‑the‑art models and the robustness needed for safe, equitable clinical deployment.
By Emanoel dos Santos, Kelvin Cunha, Rodrigo Mota, Fabio Papais, Thales Bezerra, Natalia Lopes, Erico Medeiros, Shirley Cruz, Jessica Araujo, Paulo Borba, Tsang Ing Ren
The study compares five pre‑trained convolutional neural networks—ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3—for melanoma detection using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Accuracy varied across models and modalities, with ResNet50 achieving the highest scores (84% on HAM10000 and 83% on CR‑AI4SkIN) and InceptionV3 the lowest (71% on ISIC 2018). The results show that a model’s performance on dermatoscopic images does not necessarily predict its performance on histopathological images.
By Wagner Moreno Schmitz, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Thiago Magalh\~aes Amaral, Dalcimar Casanova, Jefferson Tales Oliva
FedDermaSeg explores federated learning for skin lesion segmentation, aiming to preserve privacy by avoiding centralized data aggregation. Using the ISIC 2018 dataset in a simulated distributed setting, the federated model matches centralized training performance and outperforms locally trained models. The study demonstrates that collaborative, privacy‑preserving segmentation is feasible without central image storage.
By Anabik Pal, Ganesh Patidar, Bikash Santra
Dermatological practice routinely involves measuring and tracking lesion size, morphology and texture, as critical components of wound or skin cancer screening, monitoring and diagnosis. To accomplish this task, practitioners often image the skin surface with commonly available off-the-shelf camera sensors.
The paper introduces MIFR, a modality‑invariant and fair representation framework for skin disease classification that jointly processes clinical photographs and dermoscopic images using ViT‑based encoders. It employs a five‑component multi‑objective loss to balance classification accuracy, fairness across skin tones, class alignment, and modality invariance. Experiments on paired and external datasets demonstrate competitive predictive performance and fairness, with t‑SNE visualizations confirming alignment of embeddings from different modalities.
By Asonyu Senge Njih, Yvan Guifo Fodjo, Vianney Kengne Tchendji, Jerry Lacmou Zeutouo, Kerol Djoumessi
Skin diseases represent a major global public health burden, yet machine learning tools developed to assist in their diagnosis suffer from two critical limitations: reliance on only one modality for d...
arXiv:2610.08086v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The clinical integration of AI systems in digital dermatology relies heavily on human trust. Clinically interpretable visual concepts can act as interm...
By Linda Wermelinger, Simone Lionetti, Fabian Gr\"oger, Nipun Ranasekara, Philippe Gottfrois, Ludovic Amruthalingam, Labelling Consortium, Marc Pouly, Alexander A. Navarini
The study examines why dermatology AI models, largely trained on light‑skinned, cancer‑focused images, perform poorly when applied to diverse patient populations. By comparing a cancer‑trained baseline, two dermatology foundation models, and a general‑purpose vision model on tone‑stratified and disease‑shifted datasets, the authors find that disease‑distribution shift, rather than skin‑tone underrepresentation, is the primary cause of generalization failure. Representation analysis shows that cancer‑specialized features lack transferable structure, while dermatology‑pretrained features maintain stronger clustering, and lightweight adaptation with about ten labeled examples per category can recover most performance.
By Nirajan Kunwor, Sanjaya Poudel, Quoc-Huy Trinh, Jahidul Arafat, Sunil Kumar Gaire
arXiv:2606. 26712v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Skin lesion segmentation is a key task in computer-aided dermatological diagnosis, where accuracy directly impacts downstream analysis and disease classification.
By Jingjun Gu, Chaojie Shen, Yifeng Cao, Wei Zhang, Yiliu Li, Aobo Fan
arXiv:2609.38560v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a rare form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that is often misdiagnosed in early stages due to its visual similarity to benign in...
By Mohamed Hazem, Tarek Waleed, Omar Khaled, Nada Omar, Mahmoud Raslan, Marwa Mohamed Fawzy, Aya Fahim, Rania M. Mogawer, Ahmed Mourad, Kariman Mansour, Muhammad Rushdi