← Back to all news
arXiv Computer Vision By Emanoel dos Santos, Kelvin Cunha, Rodrigo Mota, Fabio Papais, Thales Bezerra, Natalia Lopes, Erico Medeiros, Shirley Cruz, Jessica Araujo, Paulo Borba, Tsang Ing Ren

Bridging Research and Practice: A Systematic Evaluation of Generalist and Dermatology-Specific Models in Clinical Skin Lesion Classification

Read the original on arXiv Computer Vision →

The paper evaluates how well generalist and dermatology-specific machine learning models perform on diverse skin lesion datasets, including dermoscopic images and smartphone photographs. It benchmarks a range of architectures—general-purpose vision-language models, foundation models, and task-specific dermatology classifiers—under conditions of distribution shift, modality change, and demographic variability. The study quantifies the performance gap between current state‑of‑the‑art models and the robustness needed for safe, equitable clinical deployment.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computer Vision.

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

MIFR: A Modality-Invariant and Fair Representation Framework for Skin Disease Classification

The paper introduces MIFR, a modality‑invariant and fair representation framework for skin disease classification that jointly processes clinical photographs and dermoscopic images using ViT‑based encoders. It employs a five‑component multi‑objective loss to balance classification accuracy, fairness across skin tones, class alignment, and modality invariance. Experiments on paired and external datasets demonstrate competitive predictive performance and fairness, with t‑SNE visualizations confirming alignment of embeddings from different modalities.

By Asonyu Senge Njih, Yvan Guifo Fodjo, Vianney Kengne Tchendji, Jerry Lacmou Zeutouo, Kerol Djoumessi
ragsafety
More like this →
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection

The study compares five pre‑trained convolutional neural networks—ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3—for melanoma detection using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Accuracy varied across models and modalities, with ResNet50 achieving the highest scores (84% on HAM10000 and 83% on CR‑AI4SkIN) and InceptionV3 the lowest (71% on ISIC 2018). The results show that a model’s performance on dermatoscopic images does not necessarily predict its performance on histopathological images.

By Wagner Moreno Schmitz, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Thiago Magalh\~aes Amaral, Dalcimar Casanova, Jefferson Tales Oliva
computer-vision
More like this →
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 11

Uncertainty-Aware and Explainable Ensemble Deep Learning Framework for Multi-Class Skin Lesion Classification

Skin cancer diagnosis from dermoscopic images remains challenging due to high intra-class variability, inter-class similarity, class imbalance, and the limited interpretability of deep learning models. This paper proposes an uncertainty-aware and explainable deep learning framework for multi-class skin lesion classification.

llmscomputer-visionsafety
More like this →