The paper introduces EvoTree, a staged framework for automatically generating evolution trees from citation graphs. It separates backbone learning from temporal refinement, using a graph-aware encoder and hierarchical clustering to build a stable taxonomy, then fine-tunes temporally to attach marginal papers under monotonic-path constraints, and finally labels concepts with an LLM without changing the topology. The authors release an annotated benchmark across 11 AI subfields and report that EvoTree outperforms baselines in NMI, citation-direction accuracy, concept purity, and marginal-paper detection.
Surveys remain the primary way researchers grasp the lineage of methods within an AI subfield, but they scale poorly against the current rate of publication. Existing taxonomy-induction methods are la...
arXiv:2608. 10740v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Effective research ideation requires moving beyond a static understanding of prior work to trace how research problems and solutions evolve across the literature.
arXiv:2606.22342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How does research evolve, and can we trace it at the level of individual claims? Scientific progress is not simply a uniform accumulation of facts....
arXiv:2610.10138v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Predicting the future impact of a newly published paper is challenging because it must be inferred from heterogeneous evidence available at publication...
The paper introduces a time‑aligned evolving concept graph framework that jointly models semantic and structural changes in scientific literature. By treating dated papers as shared update events, it reconstructs both semantic and structural states from the same publication history for each prediction time, and fuses these states at the pair level to forecast co‑occurrence, relation formation, and conditional relation type. Experiments on a large graph of 187,848 papers and 270,687 concepts show that refreshing context with graph updates boosts mean relation AUPRC by 16.6% and raises mean relation AUROC from 0.9290 to 0.9722.
Forecasting scientific relations can guide discovery by identifying promising connections before they emerge. Existing approaches often model concept semantics and graph structure separately or summar...
arXiv:2606. 09105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery.
The paper introduces a second-pass method for uncovering hidden relationships in knowledge graphs extracted from text, without altering the original facts. By chunking documents and embedding each chunk once, the approach uses top‑k nearest‑neighbor queries and Shepard inverse‑distance weighting to score candidate node pairs, avoiding threshold issues inherent in cosine scoring. The technique is order‑independent, scalable, and has been implemented across multiple graph databases, demonstrating high edge fidelity with lower‑dimensional embeddings and a 25× speedup in top‑k computation.
arXiv:2607. 20477v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: {\em Text-Attributed Graphs} (TAGs) have emerged as an expressive data model for integrating graph topology with rich textual semantics.
arXiv:2605.29522v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As scientific literature grows rapidly and research increasingly involves AI agents, automated survey generation has become a key capability for bo...
The paper "Learning to Ideate for Scientific Impact" explores using delayed signals of scientific uptake—specifically citation-normalized impact—as feedback to steer large language models toward generating high‑impact research ideas. The authors build a dataset of over 100,000 computer science papers, train a reward model to predict citation impact from goal‑idea pairs, and align an idea generator via supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning. Evaluation with a reference‑grounded protocol shows that the RL‑tuned model consistently produces ideas with higher estimated impact than baseline models.
arXiv:2608.29612v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sustained scientific work requires a knowledge substrate that carries interpretation across tasks and preserves paths to source evidence. We call this...