arXiv AI

Measuring Curriculum Alignment across Topical Coverage, Competency, and Cognitive Depth: A Longitudinal Framework Applied to CS2013 and CS2023

arXiv:2606. 19469v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Undergraduate computer science is governed by international curricular guidelines revised about once a decade, yet programs lack a reliable, reproducible way to measure how completely they cover the current guidelines and how that coverage shifts when the guidelines are restructured.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

An NLP-Driven Framework for Curriculum-Labor Market Alignment: Schema-Constrained LLM Extraction, ESCO-Anchored Semantic Matching, and Multi-Dimensional Gap Quantification

arXiv:2606. 01982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Schema-constrained information extraction from diverse educational and labor-market corpora remains an open challenge in natural language processing because existing pipelines rely primarily on lexical-surface methods that cannot recover implicit competencies, lack grounding in shared taxonomies, and provide no formal measures of extraction reliability or document-level completeness.

By Sherzod Turaev, Mary John, Mamoun Awad, Nazar Zaki, Khaled Shuaib
arXiv AI
5d ago

Measuring Curriculum-Labor Market Alignment at the Scale of a Program Portfolio

arXiv:2608. 12356v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A college offering several overlapping computing degrees implicitly assumes that its programs are differentiated in line with how the labor market segments computing work and that, together, they prepare graduates for that market.

By Sherzod Turaev, Saja Aldabet, Mary John, Namya Musthafa, Mamoun Awad, Nazar Zaki, Khaled Shuaib
arXiv AI
Jul 3

Automated grading of Linux/bash examinations using large language models: a four-level cognitive taxonomy approach

arXiv:2607. 02432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scalable and reliable grading of command-line examinations remains a challenge in computing education, where rising enrolments make manual marking difficult and rule-based autograders cannot handle partial credit, equivalent solutions, or syntactic variation.

By Manuel Alonso-Carracedo, Ruben Fernandez-Boullon, Pedro Celard, Francisco J. Rodriguez-Martinez, Lorena Otero-Cerdeira
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 2

CogTax: A Four-Level Cognitive Taxonomy for Command-Line Computing Education

arXiv:2607. 00140v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As computing education expands beyond traditional programming into operational domains such as systems administration and command-line environments, existing pedagogical frameworks struggle to capture a dimension that is critical in these contexts: the real-world consequences of learner actions.

By Manuel Alonso-Carracedo (Universidade de Vigo, Spain, IFCAE, Universidade de Vigo, Spain), Ruben Fernandez-Boullon (Universidade de Vigo, Spain, IFCAE, Universidade de Vigo, Spain), Pedro Celard (Universidade de Vigo, Spain, IFCAE, Universidade de Vigo, Spain), Francisco J. Rodriguez-Martinez (Universidade de Vigo, Spain, IFCAE, Universidade de Vigo, Spain), Lorena Otero-Cerdeira (Universidade de Vigo, Spain, IFCAE, Universidade de Vigo, Spain)
arXiv AI
2d ago

TeachMateGPT: A Multi-Agent Knowledge-Grounded Framework for Pedagogical Assessment Generation from Science Curriculum Materials

arXiv:2608. 13708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatically generating textbook-grounded assessment items can reduce science teachers' workload, but existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems rely on flat retrieval, support only single-question generation, lack safeguards against weak evidence, and are ill-suited to low-resource, board-exam-structured curricula.

By Fatema Tuj Johora Faria, Mukaffi Bin Moin, M. F. Mridha, Jubayer Al Mahmud
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 3

Floor, Ceiling, and the Fusion Gap: How Much of Crowd Reading Attention Can Machines Predict?

A benchmark score means nothing without knowing what a trivial method achieves and what the best possible method could achieve. We construct both bounds for a task with a rare kind of ground truth: predicting which sentences a crowd of readers -- highlighting for their own purposes, unpaid, uninstructed, and blind to each other -- marked in 120 web documents.