arXiv AI

From Static Bibliometrics to Dynamic Knowledge Graphs: An LLM-Powered Framework for Modernizing Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) Analytics

arXiv:2607. 21327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Bibliometric indicators - citation counts, h-indexes, co-authorship networks - have long anchored science, technology, and innovation (STI) analytics, yet suffer from temporal lag, semantic shallowness, and an inability to capture the non-linear dynamics of contemporary knowledge ecosystems.

arXiv AI
Aug 10

SCALE: Scientific Concept Aggregation via LLMs and Embeddings for Fine-Grained Taxonomy Extension

arXiv:2608. 07254v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The increasing specialization of scientific research challenges existing classification systems, which provide effective representations of broad disciplines and research topics but often fail to capture the fine-grained conceptual structure of contemporary science.

By Daniele Raimondi, Feichi Lu, Oliver Grun, Mariia Eremina, Andrea Perlato
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 7

Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH

The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results. This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure, aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and literature review.

arXiv AI
Jul 8

Integrating knowledge graphs and multilingual scholarly corpora for domain-adaptive LLMs in SSH

arXiv:2607. 05956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results.

By Adam Faci, Alessio Miaschi, Anne Combe, Pascal Cuxac, Francesca Frontini, Nicolas Larrousse, St\'ephane Pouyllau
arXiv AI
Jun 12

Agents-K1: Towards Agent-native Knowledge Orchestration

arXiv:2606. 13669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration.

By Zongsheng Cao, Bihao Zhan, Jinxin Shi, Jiong Wang, Fangchen Yu, Zhijie Zhong, Zijie Guo, Tianshuo Peng, Zhuo Liu, Yi Xie, Xiang Zhuang, Yue Fan, Runmin Ma, Shiyang Feng, Xiangchao Yan, Anran Liu, Peng Ye, Wenlong Zhang, Shufei Zhang, Chunfeng Song, Fenghua Ling, Jie Zhou, Liang He, Bo Zhang, Lei Bai
arXiv AI
Jul 29

Measuring the State of Open Science in Transportation Using Large Language Models

arXiv:2601. 14429v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Open science initiatives have strengthened scientific integrity and accelerated research progress across many fields, but the state of their practice within transportation research remains under-investigated.

By Junyi Ji, Ruth Lu, Linda Belkessa, Liming Wang, Silvia Varotto, Yongqi Dong, Nicolas Saunier, Mostafa Ameli, Gregory S. Macfarlane, Bahman Madadi, Cathy Wu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 11

HexEval: An Evidence-Driven Hexagonal Framework for Multidimensional Scholar Assessment

Scholar assessment plays a fundamental role in faculty recruitment, funding allocation, academic promotion, and talent discovery. Existing scholar assessment methods predominantly rely on bibliometric indicators and reputation proxies, while recent large language model (LLM)-based approaches mainly focus on evaluating individual research papers rather than comprehensively assessing scholars.

arXiv AI
Jun 19

Charting the Future of Scholarly Knowledge with AI: A Community Perspective

arXiv:2509. 02581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions.

By Azanzi Jiomekong, Hande K\"u\c{c}\"uk McGinty, Keith G. Mills, Allard Oelen, Enayat Rajabi, Harry McElroy, Antrea Christou, Anmol Saini, Janice Anta Zebaze, Hannah Kim, Anna M. Jacyszyn, Gollam Rabby, Dirk Betz, Claudia Biniossek, Sanju Tiwari, S\"oren Auer