arXiv:2606. 13669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Current LLM-based research agents have advanced through agent orchestration, yet largely overlook scientific knowledge orchestration.
arXiv:2605.30947v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM-based research agents have advanced rapidly in science and engineering, where research is organized around executable experiments, code, and qu...
The paper investigates how large language models can extract contextualized data from scientific literature. It presents four workflows: expert‑written prompts, self‑generated prompts, autonomous literature discovery, and dataset creation from guidelines. While models perform well with prompts, they struggle with context, hallucinate references, and still need human oversight for final validation.
arXiv:2509. 02581v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the growing availability of tools designed to support scholarly knowledge extraction and organization, many researchers still rely on manual methods, sometimes due to unfamiliarity with existing technologies or limited access to domain-adapted solutions.
The paper evaluates browser-based large language models (LLMs) for extracting detailed, contextualized data from scientific papers. It presents four workflows: (1) expert-curated prompts yield good extraction but struggle with nuance; (2) LLMs can generate effective prompts from simple instructions; (3) autonomous literature discovery is challenging, with missing or hallucinated references; (4) LLMs can build new datasets from guidelines that align closely with human experts, yet still need human oversight. The study outlines a practical, auditable workflow where experts set standards, models cross-check extractions, and researchers resolve disputes, enabling scalable scientific data curation.
arXiv:2607. 05956v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results.
The paper presents an ontology‑guided framework that uses specialized agents and large language models to extract, verify, and link factual triples from scientific publications, ensuring semantic consistency and traceability. Applied to 2,000 climate science papers, the system produced an ontology‑grounded knowledge graph with 133,990 nodes and 755,308 relations, achieving high agreement with human annotators and a 98.96% correctness rate among validated triples. The pipeline and resulting graph are publicly released for community use.
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific research workflows, particularly for bibliographic discovery and literature synthesis, raises significant methodological, epistemic and regulatory challenges for the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), especially with regard to disciplinary diversity, multilingual access to sources and the evaluation of results. This paper presents an on-going use case developed within the European project LLMs4EU and the ALT-EDIC infrastructure, aimed at adapting foundation models to SSH research practices and supporting tasks such as question answering, comparative document analysis and literature review.
arXiv:2610.28085v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid growth of scientific literature makes survey writing increasingly challenging, motivating automatic survey generation. Yet, existing systems...
The paper introduces SPRA (Structured Paper Representation for Agents), a comprehensive representation of AI research papers that organizes key research elements—Problems, Contributions, Components, ExperimentSetups, Measures, and Findings—into typed relations for easier querying, traversal, and reuse. SPRA includes paper-level citation relations that capture dependencies, component usage, and comparisons, and it has been instantiated across more than one million AI papers, yielding millions of research units and internal relations. Empirical evaluations show that SPRA improves source-conditioned scientific QA and directed cross-paper reasoning over passage retrieval while significantly reducing input and output token counts, demonstrating its practicality for scientific workflows.
The paper introduces the Large Knowledge Model (LKM), a scientific knowledge infrastructure that converts research literature into shared, computationally accessible reasoning graphs. LKM aligns questions, claims, and reasoning chains across papers, creating a Scientific Reasoning Landscape with Question, Workflow, and Evidence views. The system enhances scientific search, evidence‑grounded QA, and research planning, achieving notable accuracy gains on ChemBench, PubMedQA, and SciBench.
arXiv:2606. 09105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery.