arXiv AI

Coverage Aware Active Evaluation for Failure Discovery with Paired Systems

arXiv:2608. 13719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous systems can fail in rare and heterogeneous ways, making real-world failure discovery difficult under limited testing budgets.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 19

SCAPE: Scenario-Conditioned Simulation-Augmented Policy Evaluation

SCAPE is a scenario‑conditioned simulation‑augmented policy evaluation framework that predicts real‑world policy performance for specific scenarios using limited paired simulation‑and‑real samples and extensive simulation rollouts. It corrects sim‑to‑real bias in simulation labels before training the prediction model and calibrates prediction uncertainty via conformal prediction. Experiments on autonomous driving and quadruped velocity tracking show SCAPE reduces scenario‑level prediction error, improves testing sample efficiency, narrows calibrated prediction intervals, and generalizes better to out‑of‑distribution scenarios, enabling fine‑grained deployment strategies.

arXiv AI
6d ago

Auditing Latent-Space Monitors for Autonomous Driving

The paper audits runtime failure monitors that use a model’s internal representations to predict failures in autonomous driving tasks. Across two tasks—online vectorized map generation with LaneSegNet and end‑to‑end planning with VAD—the authors find that frame‑level errors can be predicted with high AUROC scores using supervised latent probes. However, adding latent features to baseline monitors that use only observable inputs and outputs does not yield statistically significant improvements, suggesting that internal representations may not provide additional predictive value beyond what is already observable.

By Nikhil Kamalkumar Advani, Vishwajeet Shivaji Hogale, Saurav Kumar
arXiv AI
6d ago

Hide-and-Seek in Trajectories: Discovering Failure Signals for VLA Runtime Monitoring

The paper introduces Hide-and-Seek, a framework for detecting failures in Vision‑Language‑Action (VLA) models during robot execution. It treats failure detection as a coarsely supervised learning problem, using inter‑trajectory and intra‑trajectory contrastive objectives to localize failure‑indicative actions without step‑level annotations. Experiments on LIBERO, VLABench, and a real‑world robotic platform show that Hide‑and‑Seek achieves state‑of‑the‑art multi‑task failure detection performance across several VLA policies.

By Seongheon Park, Wendi Li, Changdae Oh, Samuel Yeh, Zsolt Kira, Michael Hagenow, Sharon Li