arXiv AI By Nadine Chang, Maying Shen, Shizhe Diao, Jialiang Wang, Jingde Chen, Thomas Breuel, Pavlo Molchanov, Rafid Mahmood, Jose M. Alvarez

Test-Time Coverage: Test-Conditioned Data Curation for Deployment-Aware Learning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 22697v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deployed AI systems are often trained from broad candidate data pools, necessitating data curation towards the deployment test distribution.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

A Survey on End-to-End Autonomous Driving Training from the Perspectives of Data, Strategy, and Platform

The paper reviews end‑to‑end autonomous driving (E2E‑AD) training, framing it as a Data‑Strategy‑Platform system. It surveys recent advances in data pipelines, learning paradigms, and training infrastructures, and discusses how these layers interact to influence model performance, robustness, and deployability. The authors highlight current limitations and propose a future vision that prioritizes data value, foundation‑driven generalization, and integrated training‑testing loops for more robust, scalable, and trustworthy autonomous driving systems.

By Chengkai Xu, Yiming Cui, Jiaqi Liu, Yicheng Guo, Cheng Qin, Geyuan Zhang, Xinwei Dong, Shiyu Fang, Peng Hang, Jian Sun
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

Zero-Shot Cross-City Generalization in End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Self-Supervised versus Supervised Representations

arXiv:2603. 11417v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: End-to-end autonomous driving models are typically trained on multi-city datasets using supervised ImageNet-pretrained backbones, yet their ability to generalize to unseen cities remains largely unexamined.

By Fatemeh Naeinian, Ali Hamza, Haoran Zhu, Anna Choromanska
arXiv AI
Jun 2

LLM4Cov: Execution-Aware Agentic Learning for High-coverage Testbench Generation

arXiv:2602. 16953v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Execution-aware LLM agents offer a promising paradigm for learning from tool feedback, but such feedback can be expensive and slow to obtain, making online reinforcement learning (RL) less practical in certain scenarios.

By Hejia Zhang, Zhongming Yu, Chia-Tung Ho, Haoxing Ren, Brucek Khailany, Jishen Zhao