arXiv:2608.22059v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained image encoders are central to medical image classification, where expert annotation is costly and task-specific cohorts are often limited....
arXiv:2609.00909v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of automated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) report generation requires standardized multicentre benchmarks and cli...
arXiv:2609.13237v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Orthodontic report generation from intraoral data is normally cast as multimodal captioning, yet the released Bite2Text scan pairs are supplied alrea...
arXiv:2606. 28628v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Localized generative editing needs localized evaluation: full-image identity metrics are structurally confounded under hard-composited edits.
arXiv:2607. 01973v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly applied in medical tasks such as pathology description, report generation, and visual question answering.
arXiv:2608.30835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background and Objective: Quality control is a prerequisite for whole-slide image analysis, yet the benchmarks on which quality-control methods are c...
The paper argues that internal self-consistency checks cannot guarantee the accuracy of photogrammetric reconstructions, a limitation that is structural rather than a tuning issue. It introduces a track‑leakage‑free hold‑out protocol that withholds a deterministic subset of images and tests each against only 3D points supported by at least two retained images, ensuring no view is evaluated against the structure it helped create. Experiments on diverse datasets show that while the protocol is well‑posed, it saturates at a confidence score of 1.00 and fails to detect coherent distortion, missing large errors that can reach over 100 m. whyItMatters":"The study highlights that hold‑out self‑validation scores, increasingly used as quality evidence for metric deliverables, may be misleading and cannot replace external survey validation."
arXiv:2607. 27066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific figure assessment in peer review differs fundamentally from general image quality evaluation: a figure must be visually legible, faithfully support the manuscript's claims, and communicate evidence with a clear visual hierarchy.
arXiv:2609.15180v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are increasingly explored for clinical prediction from electronic health records and medical images, where identifying unreliabl...
A radiology report can already answer a clinical question, so it is hard to tell whether a vision-language model also uses the image. ModaLens, a paired image-swap audit, measures how report availabil...
The study investigates how confidence intervals (CIs) behave in medical imaging AI by analyzing 24 segmentation and classification tasks with 19 models per task, various metrics, aggregation strategies, and CI methods. It finds that required sample sizes for reliable CIs vary widely, CI behavior depends on performance metrics, aggregation strategy, and problem type, and that different CI methods differ in reliability and precision. The authors provide a decision tree to guide researchers in selecting appropriate CI methods, aiming to support future consensus guidelines on reporting performance uncertainty.
Reference labels used to train medical image classification models are not always as certain as they may appear, and this uncertainty has implications on performance metrics. In this study, we propose...