arXiv:2607. 11624v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms classically suffer from poor sample efficiency.
By Evelyn D'Elia, Weishu Zhan, Giulio Turrisi, Giulio Romualdi, Giuseppe L'Erario, Raffaello Camoriano, Wei Pan, Daniele Pucci
arXiv:2608. 12063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Integrating locomotion and manipulation is essential for robot autonomy, but scaling standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) to complex tasks is severely bottlenecked by the slow, manual process of dense reward shaping.
By Martin Schuck, Maks Sorokin, Simone Manni, Duy Ta, Angela P. Schoellig, Marco Hutter, Simon Le Cleac'H, Jan Br\"udigam
arXiv:2607. 00442v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for quadruped locomotion commonly depends on fixed, hand-crafted, and Markovian reward functions that limit both interpretability of learned policies and lack explicit control over gait behaviors.
By Merve Atasever, Cagan Bakirci, Alfredo Reina Corona, Keyan Azbijari, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh
Integrating locomotion and manipulation is essential for robot autonomy, but scaling standard Reinforcement Learning (RL) to complex tasks is severely bottlenecked by the slow, manual process of dense reward shaping. To bypass this limitation, we leverage Sample-based Model Predictive Control (SMPC) entirely in simulation as an automated, rapidly tunable expert to generate massive offline datasets.
arXiv:2604. 08780v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: World models promise a paradigm shift in robotics, where an agent learns the physics of its environment once and then acquires behaviors efficiently.
By Mohamad H. Danesh, Chenhao Li, Amin Abyaneh, Anas Houssaini, Kirsty Ellis, Glen Berseth, Marco Hutter, Hsiu-Chin Lin
arXiv:2509. 06296v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Traditional on-policy reinforcement learning (RL) controllers for quadrupedal locomotion often suffer from low data efficiency, requiring millions of interactions with simulated environments to achieve stable control.
By Francisco Affonso, Felipe Tommaselli, Jo\~ao H. Al\'essio, Vivian S. Medeiros, Mateus V. Gasparino, Girish Chowdhary, Marcelo Becker
arXiv:2609.36421v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful framework for robotic control, yet its practical application is often hindered by high sample complexity. T...
By Rayan Mazouz, Haibo Zhao, Chris Hillar, Christian Shewmake
arXiv:2609.07111v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Quadruped robot locomotion policies are often trained using reinforcement learning, which in turn relies heavily on hand-crafted reward functions. De...
By Merve Atasever, Keyan Azbijari, Cagan Bakirci, Alfredo Reina Corona, Tolga Izdas, Richard Yang, Erdem Biyik, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh
arXiv:2610.01260v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Quadrupedal locomotion requires balancing conflicting objectives such as command tracking, stability, and energy efficiency, yet conventional reinfor...
By Amr Mousa, Rifny Rachman, Neil Karavis, Michele Caprio, Richard Allmendinger
arXiv:2510. 12363v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The pretraining-finetuning paradigm has facilitated numerous transformative advancements in artificial intelligence research in recent years.
By Jiale Fan, Andrei Cramariuc, Tifanny Portela, Marco Hutter
arXiv:2607. 26985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep reinforcement policy learning directly in physical robots (on-robot learning) remains bottlenecked by slow wall-clock training times.
By Gabe Everett, Brice Gunter, Ryan Vander Stelt, Cleiver Ruiz-Martinez, Blake Hull, Juan Rojas
arXiv:2608. 02069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Developing deployable locomotion policies through conventional reinforcement learning often requires complex reward engineering and expensive training times.
By Martin Opat