arXiv:2512. 03296v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cancer treatment outcomes are influenced not only by clinical and demographic factors but also by the collaboration of healthcare teams.
By Hsiao-Ying Lu, Kwan-Liu Ma
arXiv:2608. 06430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has gained significant attention due to its potential to improve clinical prediction.
By Anirudh Rayas, Yuan Wang, Pavan Turaga
arXiv:2608.24688v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Precision oncology necessitates a longitudinal model of patient state that captures cancer evolution and treatment over time, integrating multimodal ob...
By Eugene Vorontsov, Yi Kan Wang, Alican Bozkurt, Adam Casson, Ludmila Tydlitatova, Michal Zelechowski, Ezra E. W. Cohen, Jyoti D. Patel, Max Banaszak, Caitlin McWilliams, Shane Colley, Kate Sasser, Ryan Fukushima, Eric Lefkofsky, Razik Yousfi, Siqi Liu
arXiv:2606. 02812v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modeling patient trajectories from longitudinal electronic health records (EHRs) requires reasoning over sparse, noisy, and long-context multimodal sequences.
By Sihang Zeng, Matthew Thompson, Ruth Etzioni, Meliha Yetisgen
Adaptive Bayesian Partner Selection (ABPS) is a peer‑to‑peer federated learning framework designed for heterogeneous clinical centers, where each center maintains a Beta‑Bernoulli posterior over prospective peers’ Shapley marginal utility and selects partners using an Upper Confidence Bound criterion. The lightweight propose‑reject mechanism allows centers to collaborate only when mutually beneficial, with the option to abstain from communication entirely. In experiments on 230 non‑IID ICU centers predicting in‑hospital mortality, the ABPS‑X variant achieves comparable accuracy to the strongest baseline (FedDyn) while reducing communication cost by 90% and enabling intentional isolation for many centers.
By Navid Seidi, Satyaki Roy, Sajal K. Das
Artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) are increasingly used to extract, integrate, and interpret biomedical knowledge relevant to cancer genomics, yet their translation in...
arXiv:2608.27856v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent advances in large language models are enabling autonomous clinical agents to perform increasingly complex electronic health record (EHR) modelin...
By Jun Bai, Ruilin Wang, Yue Li
arXiv:2606. 23871v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Survival analysis is central to clinical decision-making, yet reliable time-to-event models require large, diverse cohorts that are rarely available at a single institution, while privacy regulations restrict the centralization of patient data.
By Natalia Moreno-Blasco, Anusha Ihalapathirana, Pekka Siirtola, Miguel Fernandez-de-Retana
arXiv:2506. 04831v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Forecasting how a patient's condition is likely to evolve, including possible deterioration, recovery, treatment needs, and care transitions, could support more proactive and personalized care, but requires modeling heterogeneous and longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data.
By Chantal Pellegrini, Ege \"Ozsoy, David Bani-Harouni, Matthias Keicher, Nassir Navab
arXiv:2608.30912v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) are increasingly used to extract, integrate, and interpret biomedical knowledge rele...
By Bahar \.Ilgen, Yiannos Tolias, Denise K\"uhnert, Paraskevi Papadopoulou, Magnus Westerlund, Dominik Heider, Katharina Ladewig, Georges Hattab
arXiv:2607. 04912v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In patients with breast cancer, pathological complete response (pCR) has been established as a clinically meaningful surrogate marker for long-term outcomes.
By Johannes Kiechle, Richard Osuala, Daniel M. Lang, Stefan M. Fischer, Ivana Jan\'i\v{c}kov\'a, Karim Lekadir, Julia A. Schnabel, Jan C. Peeken
The study re‑implements 12 AI algorithms for electronic health records within a unified framework and evaluates them on MIMIC‑IV and NWICU datasets. It compares expert‑authored clinically meaningful tasks with randomly generated tasks, finding that pairwise algorithm comparisons transfer well across task families and datasets, yet clinically meaningful tasks show stronger task‑method interactions. The results also reveal that newer algorithms do not consistently outperform older ones, with gradient‑boosted trees remaining highly competitive when combined with modern EHR representations.
By Florent Pollet, Matthew McDermott