arXiv Machine Learning

LionMuon: Alternating Spectral and Sign Descent for Efficient Training

LionMuon is a new optimizer that alternates between Lion’s sign-based updates and Muon’s spectral matrix-sign updates on a fixed period P, sharing a single dual-EMA momentum buffer. This design keeps the memory footprint the same as Lion and half that of AdamW while reducing the average iteration cost compared to Muon. Experiments on 124M, 355M, and 720M models show LionMuon Pareto-dominates Muon, Lion, Signum, and AdamW across datasets and architectures, achieving lower validation loss with less compute.

arXiv AI
Aug 25

A Physical Response-and-Memory Model for Muon Optimization

The paper introduces a physical response-and-memory model for the Muon optimizer, explaining its semi‑orthogonalized momentum update as the maximally dissipative direction under an output‑side safety budget. It treats the weight matrix as a responsive medium with internal stress, showing that momentum corresponds to accumulated stress whose relaxation occurs over multiple timescales—fast and slow. Based on this, the authors propose the Bi‑Maxwell optimizer, which uses a two‑timescale memory kernel and achieves target loss in fewer steps on a public large‑language‑model benchmark.

By Yinze Hu, Hongjun Xiang, Xingao Gong, Hongyu Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

Spectral Allocation: Why Muon Outperforms Adam, and How to Improve Muon

The paper investigates why the orthogonal optimiser Muon outperforms Adam in large language model pretraining by analysing the spectral properties of Transformer loss landscapes. It finds that Muon’s momentum buffers exhibit an anisotropic spectral profile with a volatile head and a tolerant bulk, enabling larger effective step sizes. Building on this insight, the authors propose Spectral‑Aware Muon (SAMuon) and a lightweight variant, which adjust the bulk scaling while keeping the head unchanged, achieving 13–24 % fewer training tokens than Muon without extra FLOPs.

By Xiaodong Wu, Wenyi Yu, Chao Zhang, Philip Woodland
arXiv AI
4d ago

When Does Muon Actually Win? A Paired Data-, Time-, and Tuning-Budget Benchmark

The paper evaluates Muon, a data‑efficient optimizer, against AdamW on a single A100 GPU across 17.7M‑ and 33.6M‑parameter causal language models and a 2.70M‑parameter vision transformer. Using a 23‑candidate development budget and five matched seeds, Muon consistently reduces validation‑loss area under the curve by 3.25–22.44% and lowers test loss in all 20 primary pairs, while AdamW outperforms Muon on language tasks by 3.38–6.96%. Muon’s full optimizer call consumes 56.1–69.6% of training time versus 6.1–9.1% for AdamW, and it shows higher expected regret under restricted candidate pools, indicating trade‑offs between data efficiency and computational cost for small models with reference kernels.

By Mushir Akhtar, Hazem N. Nounou, Majdi Mansouri, Mohamed N. Nounou
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

TACO: Ternary Absolute-max Column-wise One-sparse Optimizer for LLM Fine-Tuning

The paper introduces TACO, a new optimizer for fine‑tuning large language models that drastically reduces optimizer state memory while preserving first‑order gradients. TACO selects the sign of the largest magnitude entry in each column of weight matrices, achieving a 174× reduction in persistent optimizer memory compared to AdamW8bit and a 2.9× decrease in peak training memory on OPT‑13B. This allows full‑parameter fine‑tuning of 30–32B‑parameter models on a single 80 GB GPU across multiple model families and tasks, with comparable accuracy and runtime to existing methods.

By Jichao Jiang (University of Central Florida), Cristian McGee (University of Central Florida), El Houcine Bergou (Mohammed VI Polytechnic University), Hanqin Cai (University of Central Florida), Aritra Dutta (University of Central Florida)
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

Variance-Adaptive Muon: Pre-Orthogonalization Variance Modulation for Efficient Language Model Pretraining

The paper introduces two variance‑adaptive variants of the Muon optimizer—Muon‑NSR and Muon‑VS—for language model pretraining. Both methods incorporate gradient‑variance information into Muon’s orthogonalization process without adding extra hyperparameters, preserving its spectral normalization structure. Experiments on Llama‑style and GPT‑2 models ranging from 125 M to 1.2 B parameters show that these variants outperform well‑tuned Muon baselines and achieve up to a 1.33× step‑to‑target speedup on Llama‑1.2B.

By Jingru Li, Yibo Fan, Huan Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 3

MuLoCo: Muon is a practical inner optimizer for DiLoCo

arXiv:2505. 23725v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: DiLoCo is a powerful framework for training large language models (LLMs), enabling larger optimal batch sizes and increased accelerator utilization under networking constraints.

By Benjamin Th\'erien, Xiaolong Huang, Aaron Defazio, Irina Rish, Eugene Belilovsky
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Optimizer Memory Schedules for Outscaling the Overtraining Axis

The paper studies how different optimizers perform as training duration (overtraining) increases, focusing on matrix‑preconditioned methods (Muon, SOAP) and a momentum‑scheduled method (ADANA) compared to AdamW. Across models ranging from 51M to 253M parameters and overtraining factors up to 256×, the authors find that optimal learning‑rate schedules, weight‑decay coefficients, and memory settings shift with horizon, and that ADANA consistently outperforms AdamW, especially with log‑time weight decay and momentum cooldown. Muon and SOAP maintain roughly constant token‑efficiency advantages, with SOAP potentially improving at the highest overtraining levels.

By Katie Everett, Shikai Qiu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Convergence Bound and Critical Batch Size of Muon Optimizer

arXiv:2507. 01598v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Muon, a recently proposed optimizer that leverages the inherent matrix structure of neural network parameters, has demonstrated strong empirical performance, indicating its potential as a successor to standard optimizers such as AdamW.

By Naoki Sato, Hiroki Naganuma, Hideaki Iiduka