Material replacement is a common interior-design operation: changing the material of a selected surface while preserving its geometry, surroundings, and illumination. Despite its commercial relevance,...
The paper introduces a counterfactual benchmark to evaluate whether vision models understand physical constraints or merely learn rendering shortcuts. Using Mitsuba 3, it generates 5,500 synthetic images across 500 scene families, each with a clean image and ten violations (shadows, reflections, support, surface response, occlusion). Diagnostic baselines (LLaVA‑1.5‑7B, Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B, InternVL3.5‑8B) achieve 64.0–67.8 % macro‑F1 on a held‑out synthetic test set, but performance drops to 40.8 % for LLaVA‑1.5‑7B under an intervention shift, indicating reliance on rendering cues rather than true physical reasoning.
By M. Moein Esfahani, Sepehr Salem, Mohammed Alser, Vince Calhoun
arXiv:2608. 06075v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Commercial vision-language models are reshaping computer vision, with visual priors broad enough to rival task-specific systems.
By Shilin Hu, Jingyi Xu, Dimitris Samaras, Hieu Le
Commercial vision-language models are reshaping computer vision, with visual priors broad enough to rival task-specific systems. This raises a natural question: do they reduce the need for classic, physics-informed low-level vision?
arXiv:2607. 22705v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Object-centric learning aims to represent scenes as objects whose properties can be reused in new combinations.
By Anuraag Gadehothur Karnam, Tarunesh Sathish
SREdit is a response‑guided framework that improves projection‑based appearance editing by estimating a scene response map from a reconstructed scene. This map indicates how strongly projected illumination can affect different surface regions, allowing the system to adapt editing strength across the object while preserving registration with the fixed physical surface. Experiments with two pretrained image editors show that SREdit enhances projected appearance quality and reproduction fidelity, adding less than one second per image with negligible VRAM overhead, and participants consistently preferred its results in a user study.
By Yuqiao Xia, Yuchen Deng, Ziheng Chang, Bingyao Huang
arXiv:2606. 00188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While current multimodal models are proficient at open-ended visual editing, executing precise single-answer edits remains an important obstacle.
By Kai Xu, Ellis Brown, Shrikar Madhu, Rob Fergus, He He, Saining Xie
STAGE is a training‑free, closed‑form framework for concept erasure in native text‑to‑3D generators. It treats erasure as a stage‑aware editing problem, applying low‑dimensional affine corrections separately to the structural and appearance stages of the pipeline. Experiments on the TRELLIS generator show that STAGE outperforms adapted baselines, achieving a composite score of 66.7 versus 53.2 across 15 shape, material, and object concepts.
By Karol Dziekan, Przemys{\l}aw Spurek, Dawid Malarz
arXiv:2610.28316v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Instruction-based image editing models can now add, remove a specified number of objects or change their category while preserving the scene. Yet the...
By Aymen Lassoued, Angelique Loesch, Romaric Audigier
arXiv:2610.09125v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Reference-based object compositing inserts or replaces an object using a background image, a reference image, and a 2D compositing mask. These inputs g...
By Sanghyun Jo, Chae Yeon Lim, Donghwan Lee, Sihyun Kim, Soo Ye Kim, Kyungsu Kim
arXiv:2610.18860v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Generating information-rich visual artifacts such as slides, posters, and dashboards as code is appealing because the outputs are structured, editable,...
By Xin Gao, Yifan Yang, Xin Li, Pan Wang, Yan Li, Muzhao Tian, Mingxi Cheng, Bei Liu, Kai Qiu, Qi Dai, Dong Chen, Yue Dong, Leandros Tassiulas, Rex Ying, Ji Li, Chong Luo
VibeEdit is a new image‑editing tool that lets users draw spatial marks and add brief notes directly on an image to create a canvas instruction. These instructions guide the model to perform tasks such as adding, removing, replacing, or moving objects, as well as modifying attributes, without needing a separate text prompt. The system is trained on 1.55 million annotated edit pairs and uses a layer‑decoupled conditioning approach, achieving higher VLM rubric scores and PSNR on a benchmark that tests target selection among similar objects.
By Jinjing Zhao, Fangyun Wei, Yitong Wang, Xiuyu Wu, Yunuo Chen, Yang Yue, Sirui Zhang, Wenbo Wang, Hongyang Zhang, Dong Chen, Yan Lu, Chang Xu