Hugging Face Trending Papers

MeetingToM: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Multi-Party Meetings

Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to infer other's beliefs, intentions, and states of knowledge, is central to social interaction, yet remains challenging for current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), especially in multi-party meetings where cues are distributed across speech and behavior. Existing multimodal ToM benchmarks mainly focus on video-grounded question answering over overt, externally verifiable signals, and provide limited coverage of latent social states and group dynamics.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

CoMMET: A Psychologically Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Theory of Mind in Multimodal LLMs

CoMMET is a new multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate Theory of Mind (ToM) in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It expands beyond existing text-only, belief-focused tests by covering a wider range of mental states, incorporating moral evaluation, and enabling multi-turn, open-ended interactions. The dataset is grounded in psychological theory and provides a comprehensive assessment across different model families and sizes, revealing strengths, limitations, and future improvement directions.

By Ruirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Kaiwen Wei, Yanzhen Yue, Cheston Tan
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

PIVOTSBench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Interpersonal Relationship Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

PIVOTSBench is a benchmark designed to assess multimodal large language models’ ability to reason about fine‑grained interpersonal relationships. It is constructed from Social‑IQ 2.0 and YouTube data and evaluates models on predicting bidirectional relationship dimensions grounded in psychology research. The benchmark also includes auxiliary tasks that test models’ capacity to identify and use critical visual cues, and it examines the impact of visual modalities, social role information, and different prediction settings on model performance.

By Shuxiang Zhang, Yiting Yin, Wenxuan Song, Yuhang Wu, Miao Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 18

Language-model groups overstate consensus when replaying human deliberation on a reasoning task

The study compares human deliberation in Wason selection tasks with large language model (LLM) agent groups that are seeded with participants’ pre-discussion beliefs. Across various scoring definitions, human consensus rates ranged from 24.0% to 57.0%, whereas LLM agents consistently achieved higher consensus, with gaps of 34–44 percentage points in two sensitivity analyses. Even when early stopping was removed or memorizable answers were eliminated, LLM groups still reached near-unanimous agreement, often on incorrect answers, indicating that simulated consensus does not reflect collective accuracy.

By Tengfei Shao
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Cognitive Chain-of-Thought (CoCoT): Structured Multimodal Reasoning about Social Situations

The paper introduces Cognitive Chain-of-Thought (CoCoT), a structured reasoning framework for vision‑language models that divides multimodal social reasoning into three cognitively inspired stages: Perception, Situation, and Norm. CoCoT improves performance across diverse tasks—multimodal intent disambiguation, theory of mind, social commonsense reasoning, and safety instruction following—by 5.9% to 4.6% on average. Fine‑tuning on CoCoT‑structured traces further boosts accuracy by 5–6% without explicit prompting, indicating that models internalize the structured reasoning pattern and that the approach enhances interpretability and social alignment in multimodal systems.

By Eunkyu Park, Wesley Hanwen Deng, Gunhee Kim, Motahhare Eslami, Maarten Sap
arXiv AI
Aug 3

COSI-Lab: Conference Living Lab for Modeling Multi-Perspective Multimodal Social Intention

arXiv:2607. 28649v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: COSI-Lab presents a multimodal, multi-sensor dataset of an interdisciplinary scientific workshop containing 32 academics at an international conference.

By Zonghuan Li, Litian Li, Arthur Mercier, Gara Dorta, Balint Dioszegi, Jose Morales-Vargas, Chenxu Hao, Ivan Kondyurin, Vanessa Begemann, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, Bernd Dudzik, Saunaq Chakrabarty, Sotiris Vacanas, Laura Cabrera-Quir\'os, Anne L. J. ter Wal, Vitaliy Popov, Jorge Castro-God\'inez, Chirag Raman, Stephanie Tan, Hayley Hung
arXiv AI
Jun 9

Aligned but Not Partner-Specific: Distinguishing How Multimodal LLM Agents Succeed in Reference Games Without Human-Like Conventions

arXiv:2606. 08081v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Repeated reference games test whether interlocutors replace their initially long descriptions with shorter, partner-specific conventions grounded in shared interaction history.

By Po-Ya Angela Wang, Chinmaya Mishra, Asl{\i} \"Ozy\"urek, Paula Rubio-Fern\'andez, Esam Ghaleb