arXiv Computation and Language By Ruirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Kaiwen Wei, Yanzhen Yue, Cheston Tan

CoMMET: A Psychologically Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Theory of Mind in Multimodal LLMs

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

CoMMET is a new multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate Theory of Mind (ToM) in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It expands beyond existing text-only, belief-focused tests by covering a wider range of mental states, incorporating moral evaluation, and enabling multi-turn, open-ended interactions. The dataset is grounded in psychological theory and provides a comprehensive assessment across different model families and sizes, revealing strengths, limitations, and future improvement directions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
3d ago

Can MLLMs Read the Room? A Multimodal Benchmark for Assessing Deception in Multi-Party Social Interactions

The paper introduces MIDA, a multimodal benchmark that tests whether Multimodal Large Language Models can detect deception in multi‑party social interactions. It evaluates 12 state‑of‑the‑art MLLMs, finding that even powerful models like GPT‑4o perform poorly at distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. The authors propose a Social Chain‑of‑Thought reasoning pipeline and a Dynamic Social Epistemic Memory module, showing that structured epistemic memory improves performance but that multimodal social‑cue reasoning remains a significant challenge.

By Caixin Kang, Yifei Huang, Liangyang Ouyang, Mingfang Zhang, Ruicong Liu, Yoichi Sato
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

PIVOTSBench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Interpersonal Relationship Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models

PIVOTSBench is a benchmark designed to assess multimodal large language models’ ability to reason about fine‑grained interpersonal relationships. It is constructed from Social‑IQ 2.0 and YouTube data and evaluates models on predicting bidirectional relationship dimensions grounded in psychology research. The benchmark also includes auxiliary tasks that test models’ capacity to identify and use critical visual cues, and it examines the impact of visual modalities, social role information, and different prediction settings on model performance.

By Shuxiang Zhang, Yiting Yin, Wenxuan Song, Yuhang Wu, Miao Liu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 21

MeetingToM: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Theory-of-Mind Reasoning in Multi-Party Meetings

Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to infer other's beliefs, intentions, and states of knowledge, is central to social interaction, yet remains challenging for current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), especially in multi-party meetings where cues are distributed across speech and behavior. Existing multimodal ToM benchmarks mainly focus on video-grounded question answering over overt, externally verifiable signals, and provide limited coverage of latent social states and group dynamics.