arXiv AI By Khanh-Binh Nguyen, Van Dai Do, Tien Anh Nguyen, Svetha Venkatesh, Hung Le

DREAM: Dynamic Resolution Assignment For Multimodal Multi-agent Debate

Read the original on arXiv AI →

DREAM (Dynamic Resolution Assignment For Multimodal Multi-Agent Debate) enhances multimodal multi-agent debate by dynamically assigning each agent the optimal visual resolution through a zero-shot probe round that measures uncertainty with Average Normalized Log-Likelihood. It also introduces Uncertainty-Guided Rollback Aggregation to mitigate groupthink by tracking and restoring low-uncertainty answers that are overridden by group pressure. Across six multimodal datasets, DREAM improves the accuracy-token trade-off by 1.5–3.2% over existing baselines without requiring dataset-specific tuning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
4d ago

Multi-agent Undercover Gaming: Hallucination Removal via Counterfactual Test for Multimodal Reasoning

The paper introduces Multi-agent Undercover Gaming (MUG), a protocol that extends the Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework to address hallucinations in large language models. MUG reframes MAD as a detection task for ‘undercover’ agents—those that hallucinate—by using multimodal counterfactual tests that modify reference images to reveal hallucinations. The approach enhances factual verification, cross‑evidence reasoning, and active discussion among agents, aiming to improve reliability in multimodal reasoning.

By Dayong Liang, Xiao-Yong Wei, Linhui Xiao, Changmeng Zheng
arXiv AI
Aug 3

M3MAD-Bench: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Across Domains and Modalities

arXiv:2601. 02854v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As an agent-level reasoning and coordination paradigm, Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) orchestrates multiple agents through structured debate to improve answer quality and support complex reasoning.

By Ao Li, Jinghui Zhang, Luyu Li, Yuxiang Duan, Lang Gao, Mingcai Chen, Weijun Qin, Shaopeng Li, Fengxian Ji, Ning Liu, Lizhen Cui, Xiuying Chen, Yuntao Du
arXiv AI
Sep 21

AgentVidBench: A Multi-Hop Video Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating MLLM Agents

AgentVidBench is a new multi‑hop video question‑answering benchmark designed to evaluate spatial, temporal, and causal reasoning in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Unlike existing tests that focus on simple scene queries or global summaries, AgentVidBench includes step‑by‑step solution traces to assess whether agents gather the necessary evidence to justify their answers. Experiments with 12 MLLMs show limited single‑turn performance, but integrating these models into agentic workflows improves both accuracy and trajectory scores, establishing AgentVidBench as a comprehensive testbed for future research on agentic video understanding.

By Seoyeon An, Hyeonseo Jang, Minsu Kim, Chanho Lee, Younghan Park, Kangwook Lee
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 11

OmniHallu: Unified Hallucination Detection for Cross-Modal Comprehension and Generation in Multimodal Large Language Models

OmniHallu is a unified framework for detecting hallucinations in multimodal large language models across both comprehension and generation tasks involving image, video, and audio modalities. It introduces OmniHallu-Bench, a 10,000-sample benchmark with claim-level human annotations for six cross-modal tasks (I2T, V2T, A2T, T2I, T2V, T2A). The system uses a multi‑agent architecture that decomposes outputs into atomic claims, verifies them with modality‑specific experts, and aggregates evidence through structured reasoning, while a preference‑optimized verifier reduces expert calls by 66% with minimal performance loss.

By Jianjiang Yang, Peihang Li, Shanqing Xu, Mengchen Qian, Lu Zhang, Meng Luo