arXiv:2608. 08726v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses a privileged teacher to supervise a reasoning model on prefixes sampled from its own rollouts.
By Yangyang Feng, Zhuoyan Feng, Junlan Chen
arXiv:2608. 09228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) is commonly interpreted as the transfer of privileged information: a teacher observes the verified solution to the target problem and supervises the student's trajectory.
By Yuki Ichihara, Naoto Iwase, Mohammad Atif Quamar, Junpei Komiyama
arXiv:2609.25623v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: More privileged information does not always make a better teacher. We study this tension in on-policy self-distillation (OPSD), where a frozen copy of...
By Kanghui Tian, Siyuan Liu, Tianxiang Jiang, Shuai Dong, Yizhuo Li, Tian Ding, Yuan Guo, Songze Li, Haowen Hou, Congcong Wang, Yi Wang
The paper investigates how privileged information—such as a teacher’s full solution or reasoning trace—affects on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD) in language models. Using the AMPLE‑Math benchmark, the authors compare distillation with and without extra teacher views, finding that reference‑free distillation explains most gains for Qwen3‑1.7B, while additional references provide modest benefits, especially for polished solutions. The study also shows that the impact of privileged data depends on the student’s training regime and that altering token‑level supervision can leave student behavior largely unchanged.
By XiuYu Zhang, Wei Chow, Junfeng Fang, Zhenkai Liang, Tat-Seng Chua
On-policy distillation trains a language model on its own generations while a teacher scores them token by token. It combines the dense supervision of imitation learning with the on-policy sampling of...
The paper reviews On‑Policy Self‑Distillation (OPSD), a method where a language model learns from its own generations using privileged information such as reference solutions or plans, eliminating the need for a larger teacher model. It identifies a key failure mode—collapse, where the model’s reasoning paths narrow progressively—and analyzes it through three levers: signal application, privileged information, and teacher dynamics. The review focuses on mathematical reasoning, offering a unified vocabulary and distinguishing settled facts from ongoing debates.
By Justin Robert, Raheel Qader
arXiv:2607. 26246v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD), which aligns a student with the teacher's token-level distribution on the student's own rollouts, is an effective paradigm for transferring capabilities across LLMs.
By Fangxu Yu, Zinan Lin, Xiaodong Liu, Weijia Xu, Michael Xu, Tianyi Zhou, Jianfeng Gao
arXiv:2609.37132v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves large language models by letting a self-teacher with privileged information provide dense token-level super...
By Zheng Zhang, Xinyue Tan, Lufei Li, Xinyi Zhang, Yexin Li, Kan Ren
The paper introduces a recursive self-improvement framework for language models that replaces an external teacher with a frozen copy of the student, enabling dynamic co-evolution (DCE) and self-refined concise learning (SRCL). DCE allows the privileged teacher to evolve alongside the student, while SRCL trains on shorter, verified rewrites to reduce verbosity. Experiments show that the combined DCE+SRCL approach outperforms traditional on‑policy self‑distillation across multiple model sizes and math benchmarks, achieving significant accuracy gains and shorter outputs.
By Shangjian Yin, Zehao Zhao, Kavosh Asadi, Rui Liu, Yuchen Lu, Shike Mei, Hang Cui, Luke Simon, Zhouxing Shi, Hamed Firooz
The paper introduces Multi-Teacher Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (MT‑SDPO), an on‑policy distillation method that combines multiple frozen teachers into a single student model. MT‑SDPO uses self‑anchors, answer‑verified eligibility, and privileged distillation to select reliable teachers per sample rather than per domain. Experiments on five students from three model families show that MT‑SDPO improves the weakest domain of Qwen3‑8B by 14.79 points and reduces its domain gap by 74.7%, achieving a more balanced performance than matching a single teacher to each domain.
By Xixiang He, Xingming Li, Baiqi Wu, Qiyao Sun, Xuanyu Ji, Ao Cheng, Qingyong Hu
The paper introduces TISD, a trajectory-intervention self-distillation method that forces a teacher-selected branch action and then lets the student generate the suffix, distilling the full trajectory under a privileged-context-conditioned teacher. This approach addresses a data-collection bottleneck in on‑policy self‑distillation by exposing successor contexts that the student would otherwise miss. Experiments on coding and science domains show modest but consistent improvements in average performance metrics compared to baseline methods.
By Taeckyung Lee, Rinat Amankos, Jeonghye Kim, Hyungjun Yoon, Woogyeol Jin, Sung-Ju Lee
The paper introduces Multi-Teacher Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (MT‑SDPO), an on‑policy distillation method that combines multiple frozen teachers into a single student model. MT‑SDPO uses self‑anchors, answer‑verified eligibility, and privileged distillation to identify the most reliable teacher for each sample rather than relying on domain labels. Experiments on five students from three model families show that MT‑SDPO improves the weakest domain of Qwen3‑8B by 14.79 points and reduces its domain gap by 74.7%, achieving a better balance than matching a single teacher per domain.