arXiv AI

E$^2$-OPSD: Taming Entropy Overshoot in On-Policy Self-Distillation

E$^2$-OPSD tackles a failure mode in on‑policy self‑distillation where the student’s token entropy surpasses the teacher’s, a problem called entropy overshoot. The method replaces the teacher’s answer with a retrieved solved neighboring problem to provide transferable reasoning guidance and uses the student‑teacher entropy gap to adjust token corrections. These changes improve math reasoning scores by up to 4.3 points in mean@16 and yield out‑of‑domain gains of up to 4.9 points in mean@16 and 5.5 points in pass@8, all without extra forward passes or networks.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 30

Teach Yourself Where to Look: On-Policy Attention Self-Distillation for Reasoning

The paper introduces On-Policy Attention Self-Distillation (OPASD), a method that augments token-level supervision with solution-conditioned attention distillation for reasoning models. OPASD projects a privileged teacher’s attention onto student-visible positions, renormalizes the distribution, and aligns it with the student. Experiments on three model sizes and four math benchmarks show that OPASD improves accuracy by 4.98–8.40 percentage points, reduces generated tokens by 73.9%, cuts compute by 72.6%, and trains 1.53× faster compared to token-only distillation.

By Safaeid Hossain Arib, Rabeya Akter, Ismam Nur Swapnil, Md. Faiyaz Abdullah Sayeedi, Tasnim Mohiuddin, Md Mofijul Islam
arXiv AI
Jul 3

Purified OPSD: On-Policy Self-Distillation Without Losing How to Think

arXiv:2607. 02234v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a promising paradigm for improving LLM reasoning, where a privileged teacher with access to reference solutions provides token-level supervision on the student's own generated trajectories.

By Zhanming Shen, Jintao Tong, Shaotian Yan, Chen Shen, Hao Chen, Wentao Ye, Xiaomeng Hu, Rui Miao, Haobo Wang, Junbo Zhao, Gang Chen, Jieping Ye
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 28

Recursive Self-Improvement via On-Policy Distillation for Reasoning

The paper introduces a recursive self-improvement framework for language models that replaces an external teacher with a frozen copy of the student, enabling dynamic co-evolution (DCE) and self-refined concise learning (SRCL). DCE allows the privileged teacher to evolve alongside the student, while SRCL trains on shorter, verified rewrites to reduce verbosity. Experiments show that the combined DCE+SRCL approach outperforms traditional on‑policy self‑distillation across multiple model sizes and math benchmarks, achieving significant accuracy gains and shorter outputs.

By Shangjian Yin, Zehao Zhao, Kavosh Asadi, Rui Liu, Yuchen Lu, Shike Mei, Hang Cui, Luke Simon, Zhouxing Shi, Hamed Firooz
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 22

H$^2$SD: Hybrid Hindsight Self-Distillation

arXiv:2607. 18955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models on tasks such as mathematical reasoning and code generation.

By Qiye Cai, Yichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Peiji Li, Yongkang Chen, Qipeng Guo, Yicheng Zou, Tao Gui, Xiaocheng Feng, Bing Qin
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

Rethinking Privileged Information in On-Policy Self-Distillation

The paper investigates on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD), where a student model learns from its own outputs using token‑level supervision conditioned on privileged reference information. Experiments with Qwen3 models on science and mathematics datasets show that the correct reference does not consistently improve performance; students can improve without it, and solutions from other problems sometimes outperform the correct reference. The study finds that student predictions align more closely with the base model’s reasoning than with the reference supervision, and that alignment alone does not reliably predict performance gains.

By Samyak Shrestha, Alexander Tessier
arXiv AI
Aug 6

Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation

arXiv:2608. 04794v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-distillation (SD) has emerged as a compute-efficient alternative to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards: a self-teacher, conditioned on privileged information (PI) about the answer such as a reference solution, supplies dense per-token supervision to a student that never sees it.

By Sarthak Harne, Chinmay Karkar, Yash Pandya, Ahmed Awadallah, Akshay Nambi
arXiv AI
Jul 3

DemoPSD: Disagreement-Modulated Policy Self-Distillation

arXiv:2607. 02502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a practical method for training large language models (LLMs) to reason, where a single model acts as both the teacher and the student with different levels of information access.

By Yunhe Li, Hao Shi, Wenhao Liu, Mengzhe Ruan, Hanxu Hou, Zhongxiang Dai, Shuang Qiu, Linqi Song
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

Knowledge Distillation During Mid-Training Favors Reasoning over Factual Recall

arXiv:2609.01532v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Logit-based knowledge distillation (KD) is used to train smaller language models (LMs) via supervision from stronger teachers, but whether its benefits...

By Jacqueline He, Howard Yen, Shuyue Stella Li, Margaret Li, Hanqing Zeng, Yinglong Xia, Benyu Zhang, Zhuokai Zhao, Qiang Zhang, Pang Wei Koh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Wen-tau Yih
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 2

Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation

Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation (ACSD) is a new on‑policy self‑distillation method that uses a frozen copy of the base model to extract a steering vector by contrasting activations from self‑generated trajectories that reach verified correct answers with all other trajectories. The student learns from next‑token distributions on its own prefixes, without needing reference text or teacher parameter updates, and is used alone at inference. Across five models, ACSD achieves the highest mean accuracy on four mathematical benchmarks, with notable gains on DeepSeek‑R1‑0528‑Qwen3‑8B and LiveCodeBench v6 compared to the OPSD baseline.

By Zhexi Lu, Subhajit Chaudhury, Tejaswini Pedapati, Keerthiram Murugesan, Lei Yu