The paper reviews On‑Policy Self‑Distillation (OPSD), a method where a language model learns from its own generations using privileged information such as reference solutions or plans, eliminating the need for a larger teacher model. It identifies a key failure mode—collapse, where the model’s reasoning paths narrow progressively—and analyzes it through three levers: signal application, privileged information, and teacher dynamics. The review focuses on mathematical reasoning, offering a unified vocabulary and distinguishing settled facts from ongoing debates.
On-policy distillation trains a language model on its own generations while a teacher scores them token by token. It combines the dense supervision of imitation learning with the on-policy sampling of...
arXiv:2609.37132v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) improves large language models by letting a self-teacher with privileged information provide dense token-level super...
On-policy learning is central to post-training: training on a model's own generations limits distribution shift and helps preserve existing capabilities. On hard problems, however, on-policy RL provid...
The paper investigates why on‑policy distillation (OPD) can fail, observing that larger‑scale teachers often hit early loss plateaus while self‑RL teachers achieve much greater loss reductions. By modeling OPD as a continuous‑time dynamical system and analyzing training logs, the authors link plateaus to a rapid decline in a gradient‑based learning‑signal proxy, even though loss remains high. They also prove a local recovery guarantee for teachers close to the initial student and note that minimal parameter changes and high representation similarity suggest limited adaptation may cause learning‑signal collapse.
arXiv:2610.27467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy learning is central to post-training: training on a model's own generations limits distribution shift and helps preserve existing capabilit...
arXiv:2607. 02502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a practical method for training large language models (LLMs) to reason, where a single model acts as both the teacher and the student with different levels of information access.
arXiv:2608. 04794v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-distillation (SD) has emerged as a compute-efficient alternative to reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards: a self-teacher, conditioned on privileged information (PI) about the answer such as a reference solution, supplies dense per-token supervision to a student that never sees it.
The paper introduces a recursive self-improvement framework for language models that replaces an external teacher with a frozen copy of the student, enabling dynamic co-evolution (DCE) and self-refined concise learning (SRCL). DCE allows the privileged teacher to evolve alongside the student, while SRCL trains on shorter, verified rewrites to reduce verbosity. Experiments show that the combined DCE+SRCL approach outperforms traditional on‑policy self‑distillation across multiple model sizes and math benchmarks, achieving significant accuracy gains and shorter outputs.
The paper investigates on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD), where a student model learns from its own outputs using token‑level supervision conditioned on privileged reference information. Experiments with Qwen3 models on science and mathematics datasets show that the correct reference does not consistently improve performance; students can improve without it, and solutions from other problems sometimes outperform the correct reference. The study finds that student predictions align more closely with the base model’s reasoning than with the reference supervision, and that alignment alone does not reliably predict performance gains.
arXiv:2609.37915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) trains a student to match a privileged teacher distribution along its own sampled trajectory. Standard OPSD applies...
The paper investigates how privileged information—such as a teacher’s full solution or reasoning trace—affects on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD) in language models. Using the AMPLE‑Math benchmark, the authors compare distillation with and without extra teacher views, finding that reference‑free distillation explains most gains for Qwen3‑1.7B, while additional references provide modest benefits, especially for polished solutions. The study also shows that the impact of privileged data depends on the student’s training regime and that altering token‑level supervision can leave student behavior largely unchanged.
arXiv:2606. 11709v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) provides dense, token-level supervision for reasoning models by aligning a model's own distribution with the distribution it produces under privileged context, typically a verified solution.