arXiv AI By Zijian Zhao, Sen Li

Is Per-Agent Policy Composition Safe? Rethinking Successor-Feature Transfer in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2608. 11658v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many reinforcement learning systems, from fleet management to traffic signal control, must serve an objective that changes dynamically after deployment, and retraining a policy for each new objective is prohibitively expensive.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

Contract-Based Compositional Shielding for Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2606. 14130v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safe coordination problems surface in multi-agent reinforcement learning when global safety cannot be enforced by any agent unilaterally: the admissibility of one agent's action may depend on the dynamics of other agents.

By Omar Adalat, Edwin Hamel-De le Court, Francesco Belardinelli
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

RideSkill: A Hierarchical Algorithm for Generalized Ride Sharing with LLM-Driven Automatic Evolution

RideSkill is a hierarchical algorithm for generalized ride sharing that uses large language models (LLMs) to automatically design and train a skill repository, a combiner, and a repositioner. The combiner assigns vehicle-specific skills for adaptive dispatch across varying scenarios and objectives, while the repositioner moves idle vehicles to emerging regions to avoid conflicts. By training all components via an LLM-based evolutionary method, RideSkill eliminates the need for real-time LLM calls, enabling high-performance deployment in large-scale systems.

By Zijian Zhao, Sen Li, Xialiang Tong, Mingxuan Yuan