arXiv Machine Learning

Anchored Scenario Coverage for Failure-Aware First-Hit Batch Inverse Design

arXiv AI
Jun 6

AutoDFT: A Closed-Loop Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous DFT Calculations

arXiv:2605. 26179v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) serves as the basis for computational discovery in materials science and chemistry, yet each calculation demands extensive human effort: adjusting algorithms when convergence stalls, revising plans when unexpected physics emerges, and inserting steps as intermediate results reshape the problem.

By Penghui Yang, Zhonghan Zhang, Yue Li, Xinrun Wang, Yanchen Deng, Yuhao Lu, Bijun Tang, Zheng Liu, Bo An
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

Calibrating Decision Robustness via Inverse Conformal Risk Control

arXiv:2510. 07750v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Robust optimization safeguards decisions against uncertainty by optimizing against worst-case scenarios, yet their effectiveness hinges on a prespecified robustness level that is often chosen ad hoc, leading to either insufficient protection or overly conservative and costly solutions.

By Wenbin Zhou, Shixiang Zhu
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Janus: An Algorithm-Evaluator Co-Evolution Framework for LLM-Driven Discovery under Expensive Evaluation Budgets

arXiv:2608. 08189v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-driven program discovery relies on rapid evaluator feedback, but many scientific and engineering tasks require high-fidelity simulations, hardware execution, or physical experiments, making each evaluation expensive.

By Ximeng Liu, Qianlong Wang, Yingming Mao, Annan Li, Yatao Li, Shizhen Zhao, Jianmin Wu, Dawei Yin, Dou Shen
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Exploring new directions in enhancing the ACTS parameter optimization suite

The article investigates how Bayesian optimization can improve the ACTS parameter optimization suite for charged‑particle reconstruction. By comparing Expected Improvement and Upper Confidence Bound with TPE and random search on an eight‑parameter problem, extending the best method to fifteen parameters, and applying Expected Hypervolume Improvement for multi‑objective tuning, the study shows that Bayesian acquisition methods find strong configurations earlier and maintain advantages in held‑out validation. The results demonstrate that Bayesian optimization enhances ACTS auto‑tuning through more efficient evaluations, broader search spaces, and the ability to select from non‑dominated trade‑off solutions.

By Chance LaVoie, Qi Bin Lei, Rocky Bala Garg, Lauren Tompkins