arXiv AI

DungeonBench: A Benchmark for Rules-Rich Tactical Reasoning in Dungeons & Dragons Combat

arXiv:2607. 29577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Games and simulators make valuable benchmarks by turning decisions into measurable outcomes, but many current suites under-test rules-rich tactical reasoning: the ability to choose well when geometry, timing, resources, objectives, and rule interactions all matter at once.

arXiv AI
Sep 21

GameLogicBench: Evaluating Coding Agents on Runtime Game Logic with Tick-Level State Assertions

arXiv:2609.21562v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Coding agents can modify and test code across large software projects. Game development is a domain where agents must implement gameplay rules. A gam...

By Xinyu Che, Yunfei Ge, Shihao Li, Yanchen Liu, Hang Yan, Xinping Lei, Yanghai Wang, Zixuan Dong, Yifan Yao, Qianqian Xie, Letian Zhu, Jiaheng Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 3

CivBench: A Long-Horizon Benchmark for Tool-Mediated Agents in Civilization VI

CivBench is an open‑source benchmark that evaluates language‑model agents in the long‑horizon, tool‑mediated game Civilization VI using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Each episode lasts over 300 turns, generating thousands of tool calls across a 76‑tool action space, and includes a narration layer that translates visual game state into structured text. The study characterises agent behaviour across four model families, introducing Proactive Monitoring Rate (PMR) and RAG@10 as interface‑level metrics, and finds that agents often under‑monitor strategic state and fail to execute near‑term commitments despite tool access and explicit guidance.

By Austin Tudor David Andrews, Liam Wilkinson, Jamie Heagerty, Harry Coppock, Jakob Nicolaus Foerster, Rui Ponte Costa
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

Faynt: Scaling and Optimizing Policies for Competitive Melee

Faynt is a family of Transformer policies (10M and 75M parameters) that control all 26 characters in Super Smash Bros. Melee from a single checkpoint. After reinforcement learning, the 10M model wins 98.4% of same‑character games against fourteen specialist and multi‑character releases, and defeats a zero‑delay Slippi‑AI model in all 68 evaluated games. The work details architecture, scaling, hyperparameter transfer, supervised pretraining on 840,000 human replays, post‑training curricula, distillation, and efficient inference, and it releases the weights, benchmark suites, and a platform for automated model tournaments.

By Ali Janati, Nikita Kuzmin, Rohit Swamy, Charles Niu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Guides That Cause Actions: An Offline Study of Guide-Action Mutual Reinforcement in Multimodal Web Agents

The paper introduces WebMRE, an offline benchmark comprising 541 tasks and 5,293 steps extracted from WebArena trajectories, designed to provide deterministic scoring for web agents without live environments. It enables the first systematic study of how guide sentences and grounded actions reinforce each other, showing that jointly decoding a guide improves element selection accuracy and that the guide acts as a causal instruction channel. The authors fine‑tune models that outperform leading zero‑shot baselines on all offline metrics.

By Chengguang Gan, Yunhao Liang, QingHao Zhang, Shiwen Ni
arXiv AI
Jul 1

An Executable Benchmarking Suite for Tool-Using Agents

arXiv:2605. 11030v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Closed-loop tool-using agents are increasingly evaluated in executable web, code, and micro-task environments, but benchmark reports often conflate workloads, action-generating drivers, and the evidence admitted for systems-facing claims.

By Zhiqing Zhong, Zhijing Ye, Jiamin Wang, Xiaodong Yu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

ATLAS: Agentic Test-time Learning-to-Allocate Scaling

arXiv:2606. 01667v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling has become a major way to improve large language model reasoning, but its orchestration has remained designer-engineered: a fixed sample budget, a fixed refinement loop, a fixed scoring rule, or a fixed search policy decides how compute is spent, leaving the model in charge of solving but not of orchestration.

By Peijia Qin, Qi Cao, Pengtao Xie