arXiv:2606. 18950v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often struggle with strategic reasoning, i.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
The paper introduces DoublesEval, a diagnostic framework that uses professional doubles badminton to test visual‑language models’ ability to reason about dynamic multi‑agent interactions. It decomposes rallies into key moments and evaluates models across four dimensions—atomic recognition, intra‑segment composite understanding, cross‑segment causal reasoning, and high‑level tactical abstraction—highlighting specific reasoning failures. The authors also propose TacticCheck, a lightweight consistency checker that improves performance without retraining the models, yet significant gaps remain in tactical reasoning.
Visual Language Models (VLMs) excel at describing visible scene content but struggle to reason about dynamic multi-agent interactions, where action semantics depend on coordinated roles and spatial-te...
arXiv:2609.25001v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern video games provide a measurable testbed for AI models, combining abilities of visual understanding, instruction decomposition, goal planning, a...
arXiv:2609.38881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-time strategy (RTS) games require agents to coordinate economic development, production and construction, base defense, unit organization, and att...
arXiv:2606. 09826v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language model (VLM) agents are increasingly deployed in interactive game environments.
The paper introduces LM Fight Arena, a new benchmark that pits large multimodal models against each other in the fighting game Mortal Kombat II to evaluate real‑time visual understanding and sequential decision‑making. Six leading open‑ and closed‑source models were tested in a controlled tournament where each controlled the same character, ensuring a fair comparison. The framework offers a fully automated, reproducible, and objective assessment of an LMM’s strategic reasoning in a dynamic setting.