It's How You Ask: Gender-Associated Linguistic Bias in LLMs
arXiv:2608. 13328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Professional communication is increasingly mediated by LLMs - but do these models serve all users equally?
The paper investigates semantic leakage, where a concept in a prompt influences model output about an entity even when the concept is unrelated, and shows that this effect persists even when the concept is not directly attributed to the entity. Extending this idea to gender bias, the authors demonstrate that gendered concepts can steer language model outputs toward stereotypes simply by being present in the scene, whether or not the subject interacts with them. Their findings suggest that semantic leakage contributes to a form of bias that current evaluation methods may overlook.
arXiv:2608. 13328v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Professional communication is increasingly mediated by LLMs - but do these models serve all users equally?
arXiv:2611.05730v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two foundational aspects of human cognition, abstractness and gender, are typically examined as separable. Here, we find they are systematically link...
arXiv:2502.10577v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Instruct-based large language models (LLMs) have been shown to propagate and even amplify gender bias when prompted with contextually constra...
arXiv:2609.38036v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding gender biases in large language models (LLMs) is increasingly important as these systems become embedded in decision-support to...
arXiv:2603. 23485v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Standard evaluation practices assume that large language model (LLM) outputs are stable when prompts are embedded in contextually equivalent discourses.
arXiv:2609.38036v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding gender biases in large language models (LLMs) is increasingly important as these systems become embedded in decision-support tools with...
arXiv:2605.31556v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Alignment teaches vision-language models (VLMs) to avoid expressing demographic biases, and when gender is clearly visible they largely succe...
The paper introduces a unified framework that simultaneously measures intrinsic (encoded) and extrinsic (expressed) gender bias in large language models using identical neutral prompts. It finds a consistent link between latent gender information and output bias, but shows that alignment via supervised fine‑tuning reduces expressed bias while leaving internal gender associations largely intact and reactivatable by adversarial prompts. The study also demonstrates that debiasing gains on structured benchmarks may not transfer to realistic tasks such as story generation.
Professional communication is increasingly mediated by LLMs - but do these models serve all users equally? We show that when prompts contain linguistic features more commonly used by women (hedges, tag questions, collective reference), they systematically elicit shorter, less sophisticated, and less formal responses across three document types and four models.
arXiv:2610.23587v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training is widely assumed to reduce the social biases language models inherit from pretraining, yet direct evidence for this assumption remains m...
The paper examines how large language models (LLMs) respond to different demographic cues—such as names—when users seek advice, focusing on race and gender in a U.S. context. It finds that using different cues for the same group leads to only partially overlapping changes in model responses, producing inconsistent conclusions about personalization and unstable bias metrics. The authors argue that LLMs react to linguistic signals tied to cues rather than to stable demographic categories, and they call for evaluations that use multiple cues and consider underlying mechanisms.
The study investigates how speech‑to‑speech (S2S) models handle gender, distinguishing between the acoustic voice and the content’s gender cues. Experiments across five models in English, Spanish, and Mandarin show that while the rendered voice remains unbiased, the models consistently attribute speaker gender based on textual content rather than voice. When content and voice disagree, misgendering rates soar to 90%, whereas agreement yields only 2% misgendering.