arXiv AI

Reducing Conversational Escalation in Large Language Model Dialogue with Nonviolent Communication Constraints

arXiv:2606. 26106v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in emotionally charged situations involving interpersonal conflict, frustration, and distress.

arXiv AI
Jul 23

Adaptive Capitulation: A Structural Failure Mode of LLM Responses in Vulnerability Contexts

arXiv:2607. 19629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models operating in emotionally sensitive contexts face a structural trilemma: when users in vulnerable states request information that may reinforce maladaptive attribution, current response architectures resolve the tension through protective restriction, uninflected facilitation, or unintegrated co-presence of both imperatives -- each preserving one objective at the cost of the other.

By Eunna Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 15

Communication Policy Evolution for Proactive LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 14314v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents have rapidly evolved into autonomous systems, yet a persistent information gap remains between users and agents: communication is costly, while users' identical preferences further limit information exchange.

By Xinbei Ma, Jiyang Qiu, Yao Yao, Zheng Wu, Yijie Lu, Xiangmou Qu, Jiaxin Yin, Xingyu Lou, Jun Wang, Weiwen Liu, Weinan Zhang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Hai Zhao
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 12

Learning to Persuade Exposes How Easily LLMs Abandon Correct Beliefs

Persuasion is a core dynamic of natural language communication, shaping how large language models (LLMs) update beliefs, resolve disagreements, and reach decisions. As LLMs increasingly debate, advise, and think collaboratively with humans and each other, resistance to harmful persuasion becomes a core requirement for reliable behavior.

arXiv AI
Jul 7

Exploring Plan Space through Conversation: An Agentic Framework for LLM-Mediated Explanations in Planning

arXiv:2603. 02070v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When automating plan generation for a real-world sequential decision problem, the goal is often not to replace the human planner, but to facilitate an iterative reasoning and elicitation process, where the human's role is to guide the AI planner according to their preferences and expertise.

By Guilhem Fouilh\'e, Rebecca Eifler, Antonin Poch\'e, Sylvie Thi\'ebaux, Nicholas Asher