arXiv:2605. 20198v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Augmented analytics has transformed how Business Intelligence (BI) systems support decision-making, shifting non-technical managers from manual analysis toward dependence on automated insights.
arXiv:2608. 12236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how organizations use frontier generative AI by linking ChatGPT Enterprise account records to usage, worker roles, task classifications, and public-company financial data through March 2026.
arXiv:2606. 13734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent evidence reported by Tully, Longoni, and Appel (2025) suggests that lower artificial intelligence (AI) literacy predicts greater receptivity toward AI.
The article examines the psychological costs that software professionals face when organizations adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in software engineering workflows. Through a case study involving 21 interviews at a large software development services company, the authors identify several negative impacts—accountability anxiety, craft identity disruption, erosion of meaning and satisfaction, increased cognitive load and workload, and uncertainty distress. They also describe how practitioners cope by restoring control, adopting protective adaptations, or absorbing the costs, arguing that AI adoption should be viewed as a human transition rather than merely a technological or organizational change.
arXiv:2607. 18884v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare to support diagnostics, decision-making, and administrative processes.
The article introduces the AI Leadership Battery, a new measurement tool comprising 36 behaviorally specific items organized into 11 theory-specified content families. The authors followed rigorous scale‑development procedures—including deductive item generation, content validation, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and multiple validity tests—to establish the Battery’s content, multidimensional structure, reliability, and distinctiveness from related constructs. The measure demonstrates incremental predictive value for organizational outcomes such as growth, decision speed, customer response, team performance, work experience, security, and AI adoption.
arXiv:2601. 16700v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools have seen rapid adoption among software developers.
The study surveyed maritime professionals on their attitudes toward AI‑supported decision assistants in collision‑avoidance scenarios. Results show a generally positive disposition toward maritime technology, stable trust across scenarios, and nuanced, scenario‑sensitive ratings of explanation quality. Open‑ended feedback highlighted the importance of decision‑support, situational awareness, and confidence‑building, while raising concerns about AI reliability, over‑reliance, and loss of expertise.
arXiv:2606. 12424v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As generative AI and low-code workflow platforms become routine in software practice, a key educational question is whether the next generation of computer engineers will accept these tools as useful, usable, and worthy of sustained engagement.
arXiv:2607. 24601v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate code review, but the reasoning behind their decisions remains hard to understand.
The study evaluates Vibe Coding, an AI‑led conversational programming paradigm that lets developers generate software via natural‑language interaction with large language models. In a mixed‑methods experiment with 30 participants, Vibe Coding improved development efficiency—reducing task completion time by 27% versus traditional coding and 12% versus AI‑assisted coding—while also yielding a good usability score (SUS = 71.4) and moderate cognitive workload (NASA‑TLX = 55.5). However, the gains came with trade‑offs: lower maintainability indices, higher security vulnerabilities, and themes of trust calibration, loss of control, and prompt‑engineering strategy emerged, leading the authors to propose a three‑pillar framework for responsible adoption.
The study examines how practitioners in AI-driven systems define, assess, and manage data quality, revealing six key themes. It highlights shifts in traceability, the use of models as quality assessors, and the emergence of new data objects such as agent context and synthetic data. The research proposes a lifecycle assurance framework to provide evidence that data supports specific AI claims throughout model behavior, judgments, and agent actions.
arXiv:2609.15624v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Researchers assessing competent generative-AI use at work must choose among self-reports, objective tests, and measures of oversight and reliance. We...