arXiv AI By Doreen Jirak, Armeen Saroukanoff, Dirk van Rooy

Understanding Operator Attitudes Toward AI-Supported Decision Making in Maritime Operations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The study surveyed maritime professionals on their attitudes toward AI‑supported decision assistants in collision‑avoidance scenarios. Results show a generally positive disposition toward maritime technology, stable trust across scenarios, and nuanced, scenario‑sensitive ratings of explanation quality. Open‑ended feedback highlighted the importance of decision‑support, situational awareness, and confidence‑building, while raising concerns about AI reliability, over‑reliance, and loss of expertise.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
5d ago

Toward a Decision-Assurance Layer for AI-Assisted Flight Planning in Air Traffic Management

arXiv:2609.13552v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI is increasingly being used informally in Air Traffic Management (ATM) for tasks such as flight plan generation, trajectory interpretation...

By Alexandre Barreto (George Mason University), Shou Matsumoto (George Mason University), Jorge Valverde-Rebaza (Tecnol\'ogico de Monterrey), Cleiton Ataide (DECEA: Department of Airspace Control), Paulo Costa (George Mason University)
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Exploring LLM Capabilities for Situational Understanding and COLREG compliance on real-world maritime navigation scenarios

arXiv:2608. 08281v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown considerable capability for situational understanding, reasoning, and decision making in different domains, most notable in the automotive sector.

By Julius Wirbel, P. Nicholas Hansen, Line K. H. Clemmensen, Roberto Galeazzi
arXiv AI
3d ago

Building Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Necessity for Railway Applications

The article discusses the necessity of building trust in AI for railway applications, highlighting that AI is currently limited to non‑safety critical uses due to stringent industry standards. It proposes focusing on three key areas—robustness, Operational Design Domain (ODD), and explainability—to meet compliance and safety requirements. By integrating these domains within a safe MLOps environment, the authors argue that regulatory acceptance and public confidence can be achieved, enabling broader AI adoption in mission‑critical railway systems.

By Lefebvre Renard Cl\'ement, L\'eb\'e Vincent, Da Silva Ribeiro Pereira Ricardo, Sundell Johan, Jaoul Arnaud Saiah Kenza, Mijatov\'ic Nenad