arXiv AI By Mustafa Akben, Leslie Coyne

Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The article introduces the AI Leadership Battery, a new measurement tool comprising 36 behaviorally specific items organized into 11 theory-specified content families. The authors followed rigorous scale‑development procedures—including deductive item generation, content validation, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and multiple validity tests—to establish the Battery’s content, multidimensional structure, reliability, and distinctiveness from related constructs. The measure demonstrates incremental predictive value for organizational outcomes such as growth, decision speed, customer response, team performance, work experience, security, and AI adoption.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 14

RAIL: An Automatic Classifier of the Artificial Intelligence Readiness Level

arXiv:2608. 13428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assessing the maturity of artificial intelligence technologies is essential for investment decisions, project management, and policy monitoring, yet the available readiness frameworks are heterogeneous and difficult to apply automatically: the adaptation of Technology Readiness Levels to AI lacks AI-specific gating criteria, the Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels presuppose access to internal process artifacts, and AI/data readiness dimension models employ scales that resist direct comparison.

By Juan Irving Vasquez, Juan Terven, Laura-Ivoone Garay-Jimenez
arXiv AI
Jul 24

Understanding Critical Thinking in Generative Artificial Intelligence Use: Development, Validation, and Correlates of the Critical Thinking in AI Use Scale

arXiv:2512. 12413v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative AI tools are increasingly embedded in everyday work and learning, yet their fluency, opacity, and propensity to hallucinate mean that users must critically evaluate AI outputs rather than accept them at face value.

By Gabriel R. Lau, Wei Yan Low, Louis Tay, Ysabel Guevarra, Dragan Ga\v{s}evi\'c, Andree Hartanto