arXiv AI

UpgradeBench: A Decision-Centric Benchmark for Upgrading Fine-Tuned LLM Specialists

UpgradeBench is a decision‑centric longitudinal benchmark that evaluates how fine‑tuned language‑model specialists should be handled when new base‑model releases occur. It covers four consecutive Qwen releases, a continuation checkpoint, six tasks, two model sizes, and OLMo checkpoints with known training lineage, and examines whether retraining, adapter transfer, or other recovery strategies improve specialist performance. The benchmark reveals that upgrade gains vary by task and release interval, that direct adapter copying is sensitive to pretraining distance, and that teacher relabeling can recover specialists without new annotations. "whyItMatters":"The study provides actionable insights into the cost‑effective management of specialist models across model releases, showing how to balance retraining effort with performance gains."

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

Osprey: Target-agnostic Pre-training Makes Stronger Drafters in Speculative Decoding

Osprey is a target‑agnostic pre‑training method that bootstraps draft models for speculative decoding from existing small language models. By pruning to a shallow backbone, restoring language‑modeling capability with next‑token pretraining, and adapting via vocabulary alignment and distillation, Osprey reduces per‑target work to a lightweight adaptation step. Experiments show that a single Osprey backbone improves mean acceptance length by up to 22.7% and increases tokens per second by 17.5% across several large target models, especially on out‑of‑domain and multilingual data.

By Fengxiang Bie, Yuqing Jian, Yifan Yu, Zhongzhu Zhou, Zelei Shao, Ben Athiwaratkun, Shuaiwen Leon Song, Chenfeng Xu, Xiaoxia Wu, Tianyi Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

Can One Adapted Model Do It All? Fine-Tuning Strategy Selection for Customer Support LLMs

The study evaluates whether a single large language model (LLM) can handle multiple customer‑support tasks or if separate specialist models are preferable. Using 13 models from five families and 200+ checkpoints across eight datasets, the authors find that multi‑task full fine‑tuning consistently outperforms other strategies. They also show that sequential LoRA and model merging can preserve earlier skills and improve off‑task robustness, offering practical guidelines for real‑world deployment.

By Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Xue-Yong Fu, Shashi Bhushan TN
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

MetroLLM-Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Transit Kiosk Runtimes

MetroLLM-Bench is a 955‑case benchmark designed to evaluate language models as the policy layer of transit kiosks across six real metro systems, covering routing, fare calculation, disruptions, accessibility, and adversarial input. The benchmark includes 14 deterministic scoring components (Tier 1) and 8 semantic‑quality components (Tier 2), with a 75/25 split for training‑data generation and held‑out evaluation. Twenty‑six models from six vendors were tested, and a 4B Qwen 3.5 student fine‑tuned via PEFT outperformed GPT‑5.6 on Tier 1 and matched GPT‑5.4 on the combined score, while larger models offered no further improvement.

By Remco Hendriks (Continker)
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Open-MOPD: Diagnosing and Fixing Capability Imbalance in Multi-Teacher On-Policy Distillation

Open-MOPD addresses the capability imbalance problem in multi-teacher on-policy distillation (M-OPD) by isolating capability integration from routing ambiguity and revealing a 35.6% headroom gap compared to a domain-routed oracle ensemble. The study identifies three key factors—sequence-length disparities, convergence drift, and reward staleness—that misallocate token-level optimization budgets, leading to severe degradation in concise tasks. The proposed Open-MOPD framework introduces token-share balancing, gap-aware dynamic budget allocation, and student reward refresh, boosting headroom recovery to 83.4% and providing an open-source, reproducible post‑training recipe and evaluation suite.

By Huan-ang Gao, Haohan Chi, Yong Yan, Shiyuan Feng, Hanlin Wu, Zheng Jiang, Bingxiang He, Wei-Ying Ma, Ya-Qin Zhang, Hao Zhou
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 4

Tevatron Meets Megatron: Expert-Parallel LLM Reranker Training on an Academic Budget

arXiv:2608. 00916v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern reranking recipes---billion-scale cross-encoders, mixture-of-experts (MoE) backbones, and distillation against strong teachers---have outpaced the training infrastructure available to most academic groups.

By Zhichao Xu, Xueguang Ma, Shengyao Zhuang, Luyu Gao, Wenqian Ye, Yu Wang, Jamie Callan, Jimmy Lin