Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, which optimiser, and what data to feed the model. Eac...
The study evaluates whether a single large language model (LLM) can handle multiple customer‑support tasks or if separate specialist models are preferable. Using 13 models from five families and 200+ checkpoints across eight datasets, the authors find that multi‑task full fine‑tuning consistently outperforms other strategies. They also show that sequential LoRA and model merging can preserve earlier skills and improve off‑task robustness, offering practical guidelines for real‑world deployment.
By Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Xue-Yong Fu, Shashi Bhushan TN
arXiv:2610.27895v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Direct preference optimisation (DPO) is widely used for language model post-training, but its performance depends strongly on the choice of its hyper...
By Hannan Mahadik, David Salinas, Jacek Golebiowski, Aaron Klein
arXiv:2606. 12117v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark scores often misrepresent a large language model's (LLM's) knowledge, because they rely, e.
By Selen Erkan, Bastian Boll, Kristian Kersting, Bj\"orn Deiseroth, Letitia Parcalabescu
arXiv:2606. 17660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is compute-intensive and error-prone: model performance depends sensitively on data quality and hyperparameter choices, and na\"ive runs can even degrade model performance.
By Yuxiang Luo, Haonan Long, Chen Wang, Qiqi Duan, Xiaotian Lin, Yanwei Xu, Yuyu Luo, Weikai Yang, Nan Tang
arXiv:2605.07111v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Recent literature on fine-tuning Large Language Models highlights a fundamental debate. While Full Fine-Tuning (FFT) provides greater represe...
By Haozhan Tang, Xiuqi Zhu, Xinyin Zhang, Boxun Li, Virginia Smith, Kevin Kuo
arXiv:2606. 03938v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-epoch training is becoming the standard now that compute is growing faster than the supply of high-quality text.
By Bishwas Mandal, Shmuel Berman, Akshay Vegesna, Samip Dahal
arXiv:2610. 00436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online batch selection fine-tunes a language model on the most useful part of each candidate batch.
By Hongyu Chen, Xinyi Luo, Ming Zhao, Lin Tang, Zihan Xu, Jing Li, Yuxuan Wang, Haoran Deng, Wei Zhang
arXiv:2504. 15610v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Fine-tuning a 7B language model for specialized advising is attractive in resource-constrained settings, but multi-epoch runs routinely exceed the wall-clock limits of the free-tier GPUs (Kaggle, Colab) such users rely on.
By Md Millat Hosen
arXiv:2609.37076v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models trained on vast corpora inherently risk memorizing harmful content that may later re-emerge in their outputs. To mitigate this is...
By Puning Yang, Qizhou Wang, Junchi Yu, Bo Han, Xiuying Chen
arXiv:2608. 20061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures significantly expand model capacity without a proportional increase in computational cost.
By Nayeon Kim, Hojin Lee, Yunju Bak, Jaesun Park, Boseop Kim
arXiv:2607. 20465v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The quality of training data fundamentally determines the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), yet no unified benchmark exists to measure how well LLMs, agents, and data-centric workflows actually prepare training data end to end.
By Hao Liang, Qifeng Cai, Yibo Lin, Jianzhuo Du, Qifeng Xia, Sizhe Qiu, Linzhuang Sun, Meiyi Qiang, Zhaoyang Han, Xiaochen Ma, Bohan Zeng, Ruichuan An, Conghui He, Wentao Zhang