Post-Training Science for Supervised Fine-Tuning
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Every supervised fine-tuning run forces the same chain of decisions, such as learning rate, batch size, LoRA or full fine-tuning, how many epochs, which optimiser, and what data to feed the model. Eac...
The study evaluates whether a single large language model (LLM) can handle multiple customer‑support tasks or if separate specialist models are preferable. Using 13 models from five families and 200+ checkpoints across eight datasets, the authors find that multi‑task full fine‑tuning consistently outperforms other strategies. They also show that sequential LoRA and model merging can preserve earlier skills and improve off‑task robustness, offering practical guidelines for real‑world deployment.
arXiv:2610.27895v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct preference optimisation (DPO) is widely used for language model post-training, but its performance depends strongly on the choice of its hyper...
arXiv:2606. 12117v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Benchmark scores often misrepresent a large language model's (LLM's) knowledge, because they rely, e.
arXiv:2606. 17660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) is compute-intensive and error-prone: model performance depends sensitively on data quality and hyperparameter choices, and na\"ive runs can even degrade model performance.
arXiv:2605.07111v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent literature on fine-tuning Large Language Models highlights a fundamental debate. While Full Fine-Tuning (FFT) provides greater represe...