arXiv Computation and Language By Remco Hendriks (Continker)

MetroLLM-Bench: Evaluating Language Models as Transit Kiosk Runtimes

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

MetroLLM-Bench is a 955‑case benchmark designed to evaluate language models as the policy layer of transit kiosks across six real metro systems, covering routing, fare calculation, disruptions, accessibility, and adversarial input. The benchmark includes 14 deterministic scoring components (Tier 1) and 8 semantic‑quality components (Tier 2), with a 75/25 split for training‑data generation and held‑out evaluation. Twenty‑six models from six vendors were tested, and a 4B Qwen 3.5 student fine‑tuned via PEFT outperformed GPT‑5.6 on Tier 1 and matched GPT‑5.4 on the combined score, while larger models offered no further improvement.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Nov 5

Rules, Traces and Routing Statistics: Training and Calibration Data for Open Models on ARC-AGI-2

The paper reports on training and calibration experiments for three open models on the ARC‑AGI‑2 benchmark, using offline runs on four L4 GPUs for up to 12 hours. For the NVARC Qwen3‑4B grid model, a curated corpus of 12,000 executable rules and 95,993 tasks was built, and fine‑tuning on 1,920 real task records raised the semi‑private score from 28.96 to 33.06, with no synthetic‑task checkpoint outperforming the real‑task model. For the Qwen3.8‑27B reasoning model, fine‑tuning on 1,036 of its own reasoning traces and a specialized inference procedure increased the score from 26.81 to 44.03, while the Qwen3.8‑Flash‑Next mixture‑of‑experts model achieved a best score of 56.67 after expert pruning, routing statistics adaptation, and an FP8 indexer cache.

By Nguyen Minh Thang, Trinh Thi Phuong
arXiv AI
Aug 24

UpgradeBench: A Decision-Centric Benchmark for Upgrading Fine-Tuned LLM Specialists

UpgradeBench is a decision‑centric longitudinal benchmark that evaluates how fine‑tuned language‑model specialists should be handled when new base‑model releases occur. It covers four consecutive Qwen releases, a continuation checkpoint, six tasks, two model sizes, and OLMo checkpoints with known training lineage, and examines whether retraining, adapter transfer, or other recovery strategies improve specialist performance. The benchmark reveals that upgrade gains vary by task and release interval, that direct adapter copying is sensitive to pretraining distance, and that teacher relabeling can recover specialists without new annotations. "whyItMatters":"The study provides actionable insights into the cost‑effective management of specialist models across model releases, showing how to balance retraining effort with performance gains."

By Ye Chen, Weining Zhang
arXiv AI
Oct 21

Building Telecom Language Models with RSOD: Domain Data, Specialist Post-Training, Memory-Conscious Distillation, and Networking Evaluation

The paper introduces RSOD, a framework for creating telecom‑specific language models that blend broad networking knowledge with specialized routing, broadband, and diagnostic capabilities. It generates over 212,000 synthetic training records from networking taxonomies, trains six frozen specialist LoRA teachers, and distills their behavior into a single deployable student adapter, Llama‑CalixCLM v1. The student achieves near‑teacher performance (within 0.05 micro‑score points) while maintaining a validated, auditable training‑to‑deployment path.

By Anil Srirangapatna Nagesh, Nitin Gupta, Anuj Taneja, Vivek Singh, Shane Eleniak, Theo Zhao, Moulidharan N, Shashank Keshetty
arXiv AI
Oct 31

Turing LLM Post-Training: Calibrated Distillation and Efficient Dynamic-MoE Execution

The paper presents a post‑training method for dynamically routed mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) models that integrates independently optimized specialists efficiently. It introduces calibrated multi‑teacher on‑policy distillation (C‑MOPD) with teacher‑wise loss normalization and clipping, combined with a post‑capacity bounded‑width dispatch, final‑route replay, and asynchronous rollout–training overlap. On the Turing‑20B‑A2B model, the approach achieves a high integration score (0.9988), retains most specialist gains, outperforms shared SFT and Qwen3‑8B on reasoning‑enabled benchmarks, and reduces consolidation time by 2.86×.

By Yue He, Jiahui Hu, Shaman Tang, Hua Zhou, Qiman Wu, Menglin Li, Yizhao Wang, Yuheng Zhang, Da Zhu, Zhou Wang, Anhua Liu, Hanlin Chen, Mingyuan Wang, Rui Xin, Yuhua Wei, Shuang Su, Siqi Liu, Kai Yang, Weichao Huang, Hang Zhang, Honggou Yang, Xianming Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 26

NebulaExp-8B: An Empirical Post-Training Pipeline via Full-Scale Ablation Research

arXiv:2606. 26671v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training alignment determines the reasoning and human preference following capabilities of large language models, yet most existing works withhold detailed data construction, filtering rules and training recipes, which hinders community reproducibility and lightweight model optimization.

By Qiaobo Hao, Yangqian Wu, Shunyi Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Ziqun Li, Yayin He, Muqing Li, Chen Zhong