arXiv Computer Vision

VIEScore2: Unified Image Evaluation with Spatially Grounded Explanations

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 4

Where, What, Why, and Importance: Structured Defect Grounding for Text-to-Image Feedback

Despite generating increasingly photorealistic images, text-to-image (T2I) models still exhibit localized, subtle, and structurally complex failures. Diagnosing these failures requires instance-level feedback that answers where a defect occurs, what type it is, why it is defective, and its importance to overall image quality.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Spatial Attention Supervision for Defect Localization: Exploiting Ground-Truth Masks as Training Signal in Diffusion-Augmented Defect Detection

arXiv:2609.06232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ground-truth defect masks in industrial inspection datasets are typically reserved for evaluation. This paper repurposes them as spatial supervision...

By Sajjad Rezvani Boroujeni, Muskan Saraf, Gnana Tulasi Makineni, Tom Bush, Hossein Abedi
arXiv AI
Jul 21

Simple Domain Generalization for Strong Pixel-Level Image Tampering Detection in Modern VLMs

arXiv:2607. 18230v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) have significantly improved image generation and editing capabilities, making pixel-level image tampering detection increasingly important yet challenging under cross-model and out-of-distribution shifts.

By Yi Tang, Xinyi Shang, Jiacheng Cui, Sondos Mahmoud Bsharat, Jiacheng Liu, Xiaohan Zhao, Tran Dinh Tien, Ahmed Elhagry, Salwa K. Al Khatib, Tianjun Yao, Yonina C. Eldar, Jing-Hao Xue, Hao Li, Salman Khan, Zhiqiang Shen
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 14

Semantically Aligned Gradient-Driven Context-Preserving Image Editing

Semantically Aligned Gradient-Driven Context-Preserving Image Editing (IABEdit) is a model‑agnostic framework that embeds differentiable semantic verification into the training of generative image editors. By using a frozen vision‑language model to extract spatially‑aware descriptors from ground‑truth edits and a trainable aligner to reproduce them from generated outputs, the residual becomes a gradient that teaches the generator both what to edit and where, without adding inference‑time VLM cost. IABEdit is compatible with various backbones (e.g., U‑Net in Stable Diffusion and MMDiT in FLUX) and improves structural fidelity on MagicBrush, achieves state‑of‑the‑art instruction adherence on RealEdit and EMU Edit, and outperforms the proprietary Gemini agent on the D‑LORD surveillance benchmark under heavy occlusion. "whyItMatters":"IABEdit demonstrates that incorporating semantic verification during training can produce more accurate, well‑localized edits and outperform existing methods even in challenging surveillance scenarios, as shown by its superior metrics and human/GPT‑4o evaluations."

By Chiranjeev Chiranjeev, Muskan Dosi, Mayank Vatsa, Richa Singh
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotations

arXiv:2606. 24716v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to extract interpretable concepts from vision and vision language models, yet existing evaluation methods largely rely on proxy metrics or qualitative inspection rather than measuring semantic correspondence.

By Jonas Klotz, Cassio F. Dantas, Pallavi Jain, Diego Marcos, Beg\"um Demir