arXiv Computer Vision

Accuracy- and Real-Time-Aware 4D Radar Preprocessing for Autonomous Driving Perception Systems

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 3

Stereo 4D Radar for 3D Object Detection: Integrating Geometric Alignment and Absolute Velocity Estimation

The paper presents a stereo 4D Radar framework for 3D object detection that uses geometric disparity between left and right radars to estimate absolute velocity and fuse complementary features. It addresses clutter, ghost reflections, and sparse data issues inherent in raw 4D Radar signals. Experiments on an in‑house dataset show significant gains, improving AP 3D by 8.82 points and AP BEV by 9.0 points over mono‑radar baselines.

By Seung-Hyun Song, Dong-Hee Paek, Woong-Chan Byun, Seung-Hyun Kong
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Stereo 4D Radar for 3D Object Detection: Integrating Geometric Alignment and Absolute Velocity Estimation

The paper presents a stereo 4D Radar-based framework for 3D object detection that uses the geometric disparity between left and right radars to estimate absolute velocity and fuse complementary features. It addresses challenges such as clutter, ghost reflections, and sparse data caused by preprocessing, and improves motion state estimation beyond the radial Doppler component. Experiments on an in‑house stereo 4D Radar dataset show significant gains of 8.82 points in AP 3D and 9.0 points in AP BEV over mono‑radar baselines.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

4D Radar Perception Algorithms for Autonomous Driving: A Review

The review surveys 4D millimeter‑wave radar perception algorithms for autonomous driving, covering signal processing, object detection, semantic segmentation, motion estimation, occupancy prediction, and dynamic scene reconstruction. It organizes the field by perception tasks, discusses radar fundamentals, data representations, and quality‑enhancement methods, and compares radar‑only learning, multimodal fusion, and cross‑modal supervision. The paper also summarizes datasets, annotations, evaluation protocols, and outlines common challenges and future research directions.

By Xumin Wu, Jun Zhou, Jilin Mei, Chen Min, Yu Hu
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

DyRAD: Radar Novel View Synthesis for Dynamic Driving Scenes

DyRAD introduces a novel radar novel‑view synthesis framework that models dynamic driving scenes by separating static background reflectors from motion‑tracked dynamic point reflectors, enabling the rendering of full range‑azimuth‑Doppler (RAD) tensors. The method derives reflector velocities from object tracks, projects them onto the line of sight, and uses a fixed analytic point‑spread function to avoid embedding sensor‑induced spread into the scene representation. This design allows accurate scene reconstruction and zero‑shot transfer to different radar configurations, achieving a 90.7% recovery of radar detections on the RADIal dataset compared to 26.9% for the best baseline.

By Merav Keidar, Tomer Borreda, Rajalakshmi Nandakumar, Or Litany
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

GRADE: Single-Frame Generative Radar Depth Estimation Under Visual Degradation

GRADE is a method for estimating high‑fidelity metric depth from a single radar frame, even when visual sensors fail due to smoke, fog, or darkness. It first converts raw 4D radar spectra into coarse depth, then uses a latent diffusion model conditioned on this estimate to recover fine structural detail. A pixel‑space adapter incorporates any available camera cues and is trained across clear, smoke‑degraded, and occluded inputs, allowing the output to rely more on radar as visibility worsens. On a dataset of ~95K frames from 12 buildings with real smoke, GRADE achieves an MAE of 0.303 m in clear scenes and 0.313 m under smoke, outperforming existing baselines.

By Bin Zhao, Patrick Chiou, Nakul Garg
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 24

A Systematic Evaluation of Infrastructure-Based Radar System for Highway Traffic Monitoring

The paper evaluates infrastructure‑based radar for highway traffic monitoring using the newly introduced DRaT dataset, which pairs radar data with drone‑derived ground truth. It reports that radar achieves 78 % precision and 57 % recall for vehicle detection, tracks vehicles with an IDF1 score of 0.699, and estimates space‑mean speed with less than 4 % error while underestimating density and volume by about 23 %. The study also highlights deployment considerations and releases the dataset for reproducible research.

By Tianheng Zhu, Woei-chyi Chang, Alamss Riaz, Sogand Hasanzadeh, Yiheng Feng