arXiv AI

The As-If Machine: Personalized counterfactuals make distant policy risks feel close

The As-If Machine (AIM) is a multi‑agent AI system that lets participants co‑write personalized counterfactual narratives about their own lives under different policy futures. In two large experiments—one on science funding and one on satellite cybersecurity—AIM significantly increased participants’ psychological closeness to the risks compared with expert vignettes and unrelated writing, with effects ranging from 0.36 to 0.90 standard deviations. Across 23,496 human‑AI interactions, AIM provided concrete detail while participants supplied first‑person perspective and emotion, demonstrating that co‑writing with AI can make distant policy risks feel immediate and personal.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 13

Relational Positioning as a Measurable Risk Object: History-Carried Lock-in and Self-Confabulation in Multi-Turn Human-AI Dialogue

In long, multi-turn dialogue a large language model maintains an implicit relational stance toward the user, spanning from "push the user toward real-world others" to "position itself as the user's sole support. " When it slides toward the latter, "support" degrades into "you only have me" -- a harm documented in real companion conversations (Moore et al.

arXiv AI
Jun 30

Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor

arXiv:2606. 29657v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As AI systems become more capable, training procedures that optimize for downstream outcomes risk introducing implicit agency: goal-directed behavior that designers never specified.

By Yoshua Bengio, Oliver Richardson, Tom\'a\v{s} Gaven\v{c}iak, Michael Cohen, Rory Svarc, Damiano Fornasiere, Gael Gendron, David Hyland, Aton Kamanda, Adam Oberman, Francis Rhys Ward, Anna Gaven\v{c}iak, Jacob Livingston Slosser, Vincent Mai, Iulian Serban, Joumana Ghosn
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 28

Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor

As AI systems become more capable, training procedures that optimize for downstream outcomes risk introducing implicit agency: goal-directed behavior that designers never specified. We present a formal safety argument for the Scientist AI (SAI) Predictor, trained to approximate the Bayesian posterior conditioned on a dataset of "epistemically contextualized" natural-language statements.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 28

The Argument and the Letterhead: Source-Position Coherence in AI Evaluation

The paper investigates whether AI evaluators differentiate between an argument’s content and the source attributed to it. Using 2,976 evaluations of six fixed texts across various source attributions, the study finds that the perceived quality of an argument varies with its source, indicating source-position coherence. The authors also note that this pattern holds across topics and model configurations, and that some evaluators explicitly noted mismatches between source and position.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

Love for Believable AI: Artificial Partiality and Relationship Persistence as an Engineerable Stance

The paper investigates a behavioral mechanism for artificial partiality in conversational agents, defining partiality as caring (allocation of surplus interaction above a guaranteed floor) and particularity (per-user state estimates from relationship history). It implements these as a persistence layer over an open-weight base model and evaluates them in constructed multi-session relationships, finding that the mechanism reproduces the ordinal shape of a specified curve but not its magnitude, and that a guarded revision satisfies probe-quality equivalence on a calibrated battery but not on a second battery. The authors note that the mechanism is a candidate for future perception studies rather than evidence that users perceive love, and they outline ethical constraints such as a stranger-treatment floor, bounded surplus, disclosure, and de-intensification.

By Sebastian Cochinescu