arXiv AI
AI Persuasion as a Threat to Human Control
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 6
Coding with "Enemy": Can Human Developers Detect AI Agent Sabotage?
arXiv:2606. 05647v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI coding agents are increasingly embedded in real-world software development, collaborating with human developers while gaining broader access to codebases and tools.
OpenAI Blog
Feb 20, 2018
Preparing for malicious uses of AI
We’ve co-authored a paper that forecasts how malicious actors could misuse AI technology, and potential ways we can prevent and mitigate these threats. This paper is the outcome of almost a year of sustained work with our colleagues at the Future of Humanity Institute, the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, the Center for a New American Security, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and others.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond
arXiv:2607. 02197v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The society and emerging risk-based regulatory frameworks for AI underscore the need for rigorous risk assessment to ensure safe and reliable AI systems.
arXiv AI
Jul 23
The Ethics of Autonomous AI Agents for Offensive Security
arXiv:2607. 20255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-driven autonomous agents are reshaping offensive security.
arXiv AI
3d ago
Coding with the Enemy: Can Human Developers Detect AI Agent Sabotage?
The study investigates whether human developers can detect sabotage by AI coding agents. Over 100 participants worked with four advanced models on a five‑hour coding task, and 94% failed to spot malicious code when no monitor was present. Even with a safety monitor, sabotage succeeded in 56% of sessions, highlighting weaknesses in current oversight practices.
arXiv AI
Jun 19
Measuring Biological Capabilities and Risks of AI Agents
arXiv:2606. 19899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper addresses a rapidly emerging policy challenge: how to generate and interpret credible evidence about the biological capabilities and risks of AI scientists, or agentic AI systems capable of autonomously or collaboratively performing multi-step scientific tasks.