arXiv AI

FeynmanBench: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Diagrammatic Physics Reasoning

arXiv:2604. 03893v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current multimodal benchmarks for scientific reasoning primarily evaluate local information extraction -- models recognize symbols and values and then perform textual inference.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 13

Towards Physics-Faithful Generation of Scientific Diagrams

Text-to-image generation has reached photorealistic quality, yet state-of-the-art systems remain unreliable at producing scientific diagrams, whose value depends not on appearance but on physical faithfulness: correct force directions, valid coordinate systems, consistent thermodynamic states, and equations matching the depicted scenario. Trained on web imagery with physically shallow captions, generic models produce diagrams that look plausible but are physically wrong, harmful in education and scientific communication.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 27

OmniPhys: A Unified Multimodal Benchmark for Physics Understanding and Generation from Chinese Educational Corpora

OmniPhys is a large-scale multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate physics understanding and reasoning in models. It contains 15,246 questions and 19,850 images sourced from Chinese educational materials ranging from middle school to university level, with detailed annotations for fine-grained analysis. The benchmark also tests models’ ability to generate structured physics diagrams, a key component of authentic problem solving, and highlights gaps in current multimodal large language models.

By Hao Chen, Yumin Lin, Nadila Yushanjiang, Xin Lin, Min Zhang
arXiv AI
Aug 26

ReactBench: A Benchmark for Topological Reasoning in MLLMs on Chemical Reaction Diagrams

ReactBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the structural reasoning abilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) using chemical reaction diagrams. The dataset contains 1,618 expert‑annotated question‑answer pairs that test reasoning across four hierarchical task dimensions, from simple endpoint counting to complex topological analysis. Evaluation of 24 MLLMs shows a performance gap of more than 30% between anchor‑based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks, indicating that current models struggle with reasoning over branching, converging, and cyclic structures.

By Qiang Xu, Shengyuan Bai, Yu Wang, He Cao, Leqing Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Bin Feng, Zijing Liu, Yu Li
arXiv AI
6d ago

PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?

PhysElite is a new bilingual multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models on Olympiad-level physics problems. It contains 11,586 problems, each paired with visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese‑English solution derivations, and the final answer. Benchmarking 18 models revealed that even the best reaches only 33.7% accuracy, and a step‑level analysis highlights where models falter in reasoning.

By Ruoran Xu, Wending Gao, Liyunfeng Chen, Aixin Shi, Haoyu Cheng, Zixiang Fang, Yiqiang Zou, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Lost in Perception: Isolating Perceptual and Reasoning Failures in Multimodal Physics and Geometry Reasoning

The paper introduces a five-task diagnostic experiment that separates perceptual and reasoning failures in multimodal large language models on physics and geometry benchmarks. It finds that misinterpreting diagrams hurts performance even on text-only solvable problems, and that accuracy improves when models receive human-authored captions. The study shows that correcting captions can recover many errors, revealing distinct reasoning bottlenecks that differ by domain, while a heavily pretrained model still underperforms and often truncates reasoning traces.

By Raj Jaiswal, Sree Krishna Uppalapati, Dhruvkumar Patel, Ria Khatoniar, Tanuja Ganu, Rajiv Ratn Shah
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

From Symbolic Perception to Logical Deduction: A Framework for Guiding Language Models in Geometric Reasoning

The paper introduces a framework that combines a Geometric Vision Parser and a Symbolic Solver to enable a Large Language Model to solve complex plane geometry problems. By translating diagrams into symbolic representations and performing formal deductions, the approach reduces hallucinations and produces interpretable, human-like solutions. Experiments on a new benchmark from 2025 Chinese Zhongkao exams show performance comparable to Gemini 2.5 Pro.

By Weichen Dai, Rafael Medeiros Cabral, Ziyi Shou, Yan Cao, Xin Shen, Dongcai Lu, Yi Zhou