arXiv AI

FormalAnalyticGeo: A Neural-Symbolic Based Framework for Multimodal Analytic Geometry Problem Generation

arXiv:2607. 12982v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Math reasoning has achieved significant progress with the rapid advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), however analytic geometry remains largely underexplored, primarily due to the scarcity of annotated samples.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 10

From Symbolic Perception to Logical Deduction: A Framework for Guiding Language Models in Geometric Reasoning

The paper introduces a framework that combines a Geometric Vision Parser and a Symbolic Solver to enable a Large Language Model to solve complex plane geometry problems. By translating diagrams into symbolic representations and performing formal deductions, the approach reduces hallucinations and produces interpretable, human-like solutions. Experiments on a new benchmark from 2025 Chinese Zhongkao exams show performance comparable to Gemini 2.5 Pro.

By Weichen Dai, Rafael Medeiros Cabral, Ziyi Shou, Yan Cao, Xin Shen, Dongcai Lu, Yi Zhou
arXiv AI
Jun 18

Hilbert-Geo: Solving Solid Geometric Problems by Neural-Symbolic Reasoning

arXiv:2605. 16385v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Geometric problem solving, as a typical multimodal reasoning problem, has attracted much attention and made great progress recently, however most of works focus on plane geometry while usually fail in solid geometry due to 3D spatial diagrams and complex reasoning.

By Ruoran Xu, Haoyu Cheng, Bin Dong, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv AI
5d ago

PhysElite: How Far Are LLMs from Solving Olympiad-Level Physics Problems?

PhysElite is a new bilingual multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models on Olympiad-level physics problems. It contains 11,586 problems, each paired with visual diagrams, step-by-step bilingual Chinese‑English solution derivations, and the final answer. Benchmarking 18 models revealed that even the best reaches only 33.7% accuracy, and a step‑level analysis highlights where models falter in reasoning.

By Ruoran Xu, Wending Gao, Liyunfeng Chen, Aixin Shi, Haoyu Cheng, Zixiang Fang, Yiqiang Zou, Qiufeng Wang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 14

ChitraMiti: Benchmarking Visual Grounding and Modality Reliance in Bengali Geometric Reasoning

ChitraMiti introduces a synthetic benchmark of 12,874 Bengali planar geometry problems with structured 15‑attribute descriptions, alongside a complementary set of 500 textbook diagrams. Using a three‑phase protocol that tests diagram‑only, diagram‑plus‑description, and description‑only inputs, the study finds that description‑only performance matches diagram‑plus‑description performance across several VLMs, yet models still struggle with cross‑modal verification. Fine‑tuning on ChitraMiti improves results on both datasets, though a gap remains compared to the best zero‑shot model.

By Khan Raiyan Ibne Reza, Sanjana Aktar Maria, Sumaiya Tabassum Nimi, Md Adnan Arefeen
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Euclid-Omni : A Unified Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Plane Geometry

Euclid-Omni is a unified neuro‑symbolic framework that integrates a formal geometry system with Large Language Models and Vision‑Language Models to solve both calculation and proving problems in Euclidean geometry up to Olympiad level. Its core component, Euclidea, automatically generates deductive reasoning steps and algebraic computations, while a data‑generation pipeline creates synthetic symbolic problems, diagrams, and natural‑language translations for training. Experiments show that VLMs trained on this synthetic data outperform on calculation tasks, and LLMs paired with Euclidea match state‑of‑the‑art proving systems using far less compute and data.

By Zhaoyu Li, Hangrui Bi, Youyuan Zhang, Wenjie Ma, Zenan Li, Zhaolei Zhang, Xujie Si, Kaiyu Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 25

SyncLoop: A Multimodal Dual-Loop Framework for Self-Improving Mathematical Reasoning

arXiv:2507. 16518v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown impressive reasoning capabilities.

By Xiuwei Chen, Wentao Hu, Hanhui Li, Yongxin Wang Jun Zhou, Zisheng Chen, Meng Cao, Yihan Zeng, Kui Zhang, Yu-Jie Yuan, Jianhua Han, Hang Xu, Xiaodan Liang
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

NL2AGBench: Benchmarking LLM Auto-Formalization for AlphaGeometry

NL2AGBench is a benchmark that evaluates how well large language models can translate English geometry problems into the formal language required by AlphaGeometry’s theorem‑proving engine. The study tests ten state‑of‑the‑art LLMs, comparing executable translation accuracy, syntactic correctness, and error types, and finds a large gap between closed‑source and open‑source models. The authors also propose an error taxonomy and test mitigation strategies such as few‑shot prompting, fine‑tuning, and human‑guided hinting, which improve performance across model families.

By Samuel Xiao, Judy Song, Rory Hu, Ziliang Zong