arXiv AI By Qiang Xu, Shengyuan Bai, Yu Wang, He Cao, Leqing Chen, Yuanyuan Liu, Bin Feng, Zijing Liu, Yu Li

ReactBench: A Benchmark for Topological Reasoning in MLLMs on Chemical Reaction Diagrams

Read the original on arXiv AI →

ReactBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate the structural reasoning abilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) using chemical reaction diagrams. The dataset contains 1,618 expert‑annotated question‑answer pairs that test reasoning across four hierarchical task dimensions, from simple endpoint counting to complex topological analysis. Evaluation of 24 MLLMs shows a performance gap of more than 30% between anchor‑based tasks and holistic structural reasoning tasks, indicating that current models struggle with reasoning over branching, converging, and cyclic structures.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 23

ChemVTS-Bench: Evaluating Visual-Textual-Symbolic Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models in Chemistry

ChemVTS-Bench is a domain-authentic benchmark that evaluates Visual‑Textual‑Symbolic reasoning in multimodal large language models for chemistry. It presents diverse chemical problems—organic molecules, inorganic materials, and 3D crystal structures—in three input modes: visual-only, visual‑text hybrid, and SMILES-based symbolic. The benchmark includes an automated agent workflow for inference, answer verification, and failure diagnosis, and shows that visual-only inputs and structural chemistry remain challenging for current models.

By Zhiyuan Huang, Baichuan Yang, Zikun He, Yanhong Wu, Fang Hongyu, Zhenhe Liu, Lin Dongsheng, Bing Su
arXiv AI
Sep 18

oMeBench: Towards Robust Benchmarking of LLMs in Organic Mechanism Elucidation and Reasoning

oMeBench is a large-scale, expert-curated benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on organic mechanism reasoning. It contains over 10,000 annotated mechanistic steps, including reaction type labels, intermediate structures, and difficulty ratings, and introduces the oMeS scoring framework to assess logical consistency and chemical structural similarity. Evaluation shows that while current LLMs display promising chemical intuition, they often fail to produce correct and consistent multi-step reasoning, though prompting and fine-tuning can bring smaller models up to the level of closed‑source frontier models.

By Ruiling Xu, Yifan Zhang
arXiv AI
Oct 26

RxnExBench: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Structured Chemical Reaction Extraction from Scientific Literature

RxnExBench is a multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate vision‑language models on the task of extracting structured chemical reaction data from dense figures in synthetic chemistry literature. The dataset, compiled from high‑impact journals, contains 3,565 expert‑annotated reactions and 2,361 molecular structures, organized under a unified schema of 15 reaction roles and 26 core fields. It also introduces a difficulty taxonomy, a modular annotation pipeline, and the Oracle‑MolRec protocol to separate molecular recognition from higher‑level reasoning, and shows that current state‑of‑the‑art models struggle as schema complexity and reasoning demands increase.

By Jiaxing Sun, Junyuan Gao, Ruikang Zhang, Hao Zheng, Lingli Ge, Xiao An, Jiang Wu, Huazheng Zeng, Jiahe Song, Chen Zhu, Haote Yang, Jingchao Wang, Lu Chen, Yuanyuan Cao, Ruijie Zhang, Shengxin Lu, Weijia Li, Lijun Wu, Conghui He